RT @AMRubio_: 🆘#COVID19 Distancia 8 metros! Nuevo estudio que demuestra lo que ya sabíamos hace tiempo. La distancia de 1-2 metros no es s…
Dachte mir eigentlich schon fast, dass diese 1,50m mehr oder weniger gewürfelt sind. https://t.co/E8XtyH3Gle
#socialdistancing of 8m may be more appropriate
RT @AMRubio_: 🆘#COVID19 Distancia 8 metros! Nuevo estudio que demuestra lo que ya sabíamos hace tiempo. La distancia de 1-2 metros no es s…
RT @JocelyneBasseal: Turbulent Gas Clouds & Respiratory Pathogen Emissions “Wearing of appropriate personal protection equipment is vitally…
😓😓
'Recommendations for separations of 3 to 6 feet (1-2 m) may underestimate the distance, timescale, and persistence over which the cloud and its pathogenic payload travel, thus generating an underappreciated potential exposure range for a health caseworker'
Research shows classification of infections as “Airborne” or “droplet” is incorrect. Big implications for COVId-19 PPE and social distancing should be at least 8m. https://t.co/L92eltquPq
RT @AMRubio_: 🆘#COVID19 Distancia 8 metros! Nuevo estudio que demuestra lo que ya sabíamos hace tiempo. La distancia de 1-2 metros no es s…
STAY HOME! Standing 6 feet away from someone doesn't guarantee that you're safe from infection. Exhaled droplets can travel much further says this recent piece in @JAMA_current 👇 https://t.co/0Dcwp4Ku2y #StayHomeSaveLives #COVID19 #coronavirus
RT @AMRubio_: 🆘#COVID19 Distancia 8 metros! Nuevo estudio que demuestra lo que ya sabíamos hace tiempo. La distancia de 1-2 metros no es s…
RT @perrymetzger: So I was wondering recently here on twitter if the 2m rule was largely based on bad science. It seems others have wondere…
RT @AMRubio_: 🆘#COVID19 Distancia 8 metros! Nuevo estudio que demuestra lo que ya sabíamos hace tiempo. La distancia de 1-2 metros no es s…
RT @JocelyneBasseal: Turbulent Gas Clouds & Respiratory Pathogen Emissions “Wearing of appropriate personal protection equipment is vitally…
RT @AMRubio_: 🆘#COVID19 Distancia 8 metros! Nuevo estudio que demuestra lo que ya sabíamos hace tiempo. La distancia de 1-2 metros no es s…
RT @AMRubio_: 🆘#COVID19 Distancia 8 metros! Nuevo estudio que demuestra lo que ya sabíamos hace tiempo. La distancia de 1-2 metros no es s…
RT @AMRubio_: 🆘#COVID19 Distancia 8 metros! Nuevo estudio que demuestra lo que ya sabíamos hace tiempo. La distancia de 1-2 metros no es s…
RT @perrymetzger: So I was wondering recently here on twitter if the 2m rule was largely based on bad science. It seems others have wondere…
RT @AMRubio_: 🆘#COVID19 Distancia 8 metros! Nuevo estudio que demuestra lo que ya sabíamos hace tiempo. La distancia de 1-2 metros no es s…
À avoir en tête. NB: faut pas se méfier de l'air à moins d'être à côté de la personne qui éternue (les gouttelettes retombent, voire s'évaporent ce qui tue le virus). Mais méfiance pour tout ce qu'on touche. Avant de vous tripoter le visage, lavez vous l
RT @JocelyneBasseal: Turbulent Gas Clouds & Respiratory Pathogen Emissions “Wearing of appropriate personal protection equipment is vitally…
@JaviSantamarta @HUMORJMNIETO @abc_es Ojo que lo estamos haciendo mal https://t.co/4rHfbmkaSJ
RT @JocelyneBasseal: Turbulent Gas Clouds & Respiratory Pathogen Emissions “Wearing of appropriate personal protection equipment is vitally…
@FLMIRONES @juanrallo @jgcorripio Ojo con esto...... https://t.co/4rHfbmkaSJ
RT @princertitude: Mécanique des fluides du atchoum https://t.co/GOc39Fg2Er
RT @AMRubio_: 🆘#COVID19 Distancia 8 metros! Nuevo estudio que demuestra lo que ya sabíamos hace tiempo. La distancia de 1-2 metros no es s…
RT @AMRubio_: 🆘#COVID19 Distancia 8 metros! Nuevo estudio que demuestra lo que ya sabíamos hace tiempo. La distancia de 1-2 metros no es s…
@PabloFuente Señor la Fuente......debería de difundir esto......deberíamos de saberlo porque todo lo hecho hasta ahora es insuficiente.... https://t.co/4rHfbmkaSJ
RT @AMRubio_: 🆘#COVID19 Distancia 8 metros! Nuevo estudio que demuestra lo que ya sabíamos hace tiempo. La distancia de 1-2 metros no es s…
RT @AMRubio_: 🆘#COVID19 Distancia 8 metros! Nuevo estudio que demuestra lo que ya sabíamos hace tiempo. La distancia de 1-2 metros no es s…
RT @JocelyneBasseal: Turbulent Gas Clouds & Respiratory Pathogen Emissions “Wearing of appropriate personal protection equipment is vitally…
RT @JocelyneBasseal: Turbulent Gas Clouds & Respiratory Pathogen Emissions “Wearing of appropriate personal protection equipment is vitally…
RT @AMRubio_: 🆘#COVID19 Distancia 8 metros! Nuevo estudio que demuestra lo que ya sabíamos hace tiempo. La distancia de 1-2 metros no es s…
RT @JocelyneBasseal: Turbulent Gas Clouds & Respiratory Pathogen Emissions “Wearing of appropriate personal protection equipment is vitally…
RT @Michael18879022: @balajis Seriously. This JAMA paper from MIT scientists suggests the current precautions are based on 1930's models of…
RT @JocelyneBasseal: Turbulent Gas Clouds & Respiratory Pathogen Emissions “Wearing of appropriate personal protection equipment is vitally…
RT @obulentyildiz: A new #JAMA paper suggests that clouds of #sneeze and #cough could carry virus-containing droplets up to 7-8 meters. htt…
RT @obulentyildiz: A new #JAMA paper suggests that clouds of #sneeze and #cough could carry virus-containing droplets up to 7-8 meters. htt…
A new #JAMA paper suggests that clouds of #sneeze and #cough could carry virus-containing droplets up to 7-8 meters. https://t.co/ikhVdgPney #COVID19 #CoronavirusOutbreak #StayHome #PhysicalDistancing https://t.co/l19uRixBWu
“Given the turbulent puff cloud dynamic model, recommendations for separations of 3 to 6 feet (1-2 m) may underestimate the distance, timescale, and persistence over which the cloud and its pathogenic payload travel."
RT @AMRubio_: 🆘#COVID19 Distancia 8 metros! Nuevo estudio que demuestra lo que ya sabíamos hace tiempo. La distancia de 1-2 metros no es s…
Can somebody please tell all the selfish me-me-me joggers who insist on running past people coming in the opposite direction instead of exercising away from others? #CoronaLockdown #CoronaUpdate
RT @neuropsykologen: Peak exhalation speeds can reach up to 10-30 m per second, creating a cloud that can span 7-8 m. Recommendations for s…
This explains why China was able to demonstrate that one dude in the back of a bus could infect people up to 4.5m away. It also makes me worried about all the runners I pass when out running... We've all been giving each other wide berth, but probably not
RT @neuropsykologen: Peak exhalation speeds can reach up to 10-30 m per second, creating a cloud that can span 7-8 m. Recommendations for s…
Guten Morgen @M_T_Franz Was meinen Sie ist der Meter Distanz eigentlich zuwenig? Grundlagen der Frage: https://t.co/OuR1vgtBJw https://t.co/KFdEgidIhV Danke im Voraus für Ihre Mühe, LG und einen schönen Tag noch bleiben´s g´sund!
This is not good news! https://t.co/zklIYSPuLj
RT @JocelyneBasseal: Turbulent Gas Clouds & Respiratory Pathogen Emissions “Wearing of appropriate personal protection equipment is vitally…
Peak exhalation speeds can reach up to 10-30 m per second, creating a cloud that can span 7-8 m. Recommendations for separations of 1-2 m may underestimate the potential exposure range for a health care worker | https://t.co/wFNrLyV9tt | @AgnesWold
From Droplet to droplet residue that stay suspended in the air for hours. Protect your health care workers #Covid_19 #StayHome #HealthcareHeroes
RT @JocelyneBasseal: Turbulent Gas Clouds & Respiratory Pathogen Emissions “Wearing of appropriate personal protection equipment is vitally…
💦 Visualisation de la nécessité de rester à bonne distance les uns des autres pour un temps #SocialDistancing #COVID19france #Confinementjour12
Den nuvarande förståelsen för överföring av infektionssjukdomar via luften förutses på en modell som utvecklats på 30 talet. https://t.co/j9jDozxqfR
RT @AMRubio_: 🆘#COVID19 Distancia 8 metros! Nuevo estudio que demuestra lo que ya sabíamos hace tiempo. La distancia de 1-2 metros no es s…
6 ft and N95 masks might not be enough: “Given...an individual patient’s physiology and environmental conditions...the gas cloud and its payload of pathogen-bearing droplets of all sizes can travel 23 to 27 feet (7-8 m).” https://t.co/3OzUXtKrFc
RT @JocelyneBasseal: Turbulent Gas Clouds & Respiratory Pathogen Emissions “Wearing of appropriate personal protection equipment is vitally…
RT @AMRubio_: 🆘#COVID19 Distancia 8 metros! Nuevo estudio que demuestra lo que ya sabíamos hace tiempo. La distancia de 1-2 metros no es s…
RT @JocelyneBasseal: Turbulent Gas Clouds & Respiratory Pathogen Emissions “Wearing of appropriate personal protection equipment is vitally…
RT @KerriLarovere: Turbulent Gas Clouds and Respiratory Pathogen Emissions: Potential Implications for Reducing Transmission of COVID-19 |…
RT @JocelyneBasseal: Turbulent Gas Clouds & Respiratory Pathogen Emissions “Wearing of appropriate personal protection equipment is vitally…
RT @JAMA_current: The rapid spread of #COVID19 highlights the need to better understand the dynamics of respiratory disease transmission ht…
Six foot distance may not be enough. New modeling of sneezing shows a Turbulent Gas Cloud. Peak exhalation speeds can reach up to 33 to 100 feet per second, creating a infectious cloud that can span approximately 23 to 27 feet. https://t.co/8WpESXcNmv #Was
RT @AMRubio_: 🆘#COVID19 Distancia 8 metros! Nuevo estudio que demuestra lo que ya sabíamos hace tiempo. La distancia de 1-2 metros no es s…
RT @JocelyneBasseal: Turbulent Gas Clouds & Respiratory Pathogen Emissions “Wearing of appropriate personal protection equipment is vitally…
RT @JAMA_current: The rapid spread of #COVID19 highlights the need to better understand the dynamics of respiratory disease transmission ht…
"Turbulent Gas Clouds & Respiratory Pathogen Emissions" - 2 m distance might not be enough, wearing a mask seems vital in reducing the risk of catching #COVID19 #wearamask
RT @JocelyneBasseal: Turbulent Gas Clouds & Respiratory Pathogen Emissions “Wearing of appropriate personal protection equipment is vitally…
RT @princertitude: Mécanique des fluides du atchoum https://t.co/GOc39Fg2Er
RT @AMRubio_: 🆘#COVID19 Distancia 8 metros! Nuevo estudio que demuestra lo que ya sabíamos hace tiempo. La distancia de 1-2 metros no es s…
RT @JocelyneBasseal: Turbulent Gas Clouds & Respiratory Pathogen Emissions “Wearing of appropriate personal protection equipment is vitally…
RT @AMRubio_: 🆘#COVID19 Distancia 8 metros! Nuevo estudio que demuestra lo que ya sabíamos hace tiempo. La distancia de 1-2 metros no es s…
RT @JocelyneBasseal: Turbulent Gas Clouds & Respiratory Pathogen Emissions “Wearing of appropriate personal protection equipment is vitally…
Latest research from MIT, USA suggests 2m could be too arbitrary... apparently warm temperatures may increase the distance to 8m and droplets may stay suspended in air! https://t.co/9ZdlqEAhfD
Sigan creyendo que el tapabocas no sirve 😡
Mécanique des fluides du atchoum https://t.co/GOc39Fg2Er
Beware! Use appropriate PPE! #COVID19
RT @AMRubio_: 🆘#COVID19 Distancia 8 metros! Nuevo estudio que demuestra lo que ya sabíamos hace tiempo. La distancia de 1-2 metros no es s…
RT @Michael18879022: @balajis Seriously. This JAMA paper from MIT scientists suggests the current precautions are based on 1930's models of…
This is why we need to social distance and to limit our exposure. #SocialDistancing saves lives #StayAtHomeAndStaySafe everyone. And we must demand proper PPEs provide to healthcare workers and first responders NOW!#ProtectHealthCareWorkers
@EdBelongia @yellingatwind This JAMA paper from MIT scientists (03/26/2020) suggests the current precautions are based on 1930's models of droplet transmission and are wholey insufficient based on new research regarding long distance movements of droplets
RT @JocelyneBasseal: Turbulent Gas Clouds & Respiratory Pathogen Emissions “Wearing of appropriate personal protection equipment is vitally…
RT @JocelyneBasseal: Turbulent Gas Clouds & Respiratory Pathogen Emissions “Wearing of appropriate personal protection equipment is vitally…
@ElisssabethT @kevinpurcell @gstanchev This paper now available as well, directly on the topic of pathogenic clouds from exhalation. Also includes some data on potential range from sneezing: https://t.co/GqtgVZwLdZ
This JAMA paper from MIT scientists (03/26/2020) suggests the current precautions are based on 1930's models of droplet transmission and are wholey insufficient based on new research regarding long distance movements of droplets and viruses. https://t.co
@jeremyphoward Seriously. This JAMA paper from MIT scientists (03/26/2020) suggests the current precautions are based on 1930's models of droplet transmission and are wholey insufficient based on new research regarding long distance movements of droplets a
@balajis Seriously. This JAMA paper from MIT scientists suggests the current precautions are based on 1930's models of droplet transmission and are wholey insufficient based on new research regarding long distance movements of droplets and viruses. https
RT @KiraNewmanMDPhD: Just read this fascinating article on the history of the large v. small droplet dichotomy, “the turbulent puff cloud d…
"Even when max containment policies were enforced, rapid intntl spread of COVID-19 suggests that using arbitrary droplet size cutoffs may not accurately reflect what actually occurs w/ resp emissions, possibly contrib to the ineffectiveness of procedures u
RT @JocelyneBasseal: Turbulent Gas Clouds & Respiratory Pathogen Emissions “Wearing of appropriate personal protection equipment is vitally…
RT @JocelyneBasseal: Turbulent Gas Clouds & Respiratory Pathogen Emissions “Wearing of appropriate personal protection equipment is vitally…
RT @JocelyneBasseal: Turbulent Gas Clouds & Respiratory Pathogen Emissions “Wearing of appropriate personal protection equipment is vitally…
RT @JocelyneBasseal: Turbulent Gas Clouds & Respiratory Pathogen Emissions “Wearing of appropriate personal protection equipment is vitally…
RT @JocelyneBasseal: Turbulent Gas Clouds & Respiratory Pathogen Emissions “Wearing of appropriate personal protection equipment is vitally…
🆘#COVID19 Distancia 8 metros! Nuevo estudio que demuestra lo que ya sabíamos hace tiempo. La distancia de 1-2 metros no es suficiente. El aerosol llega hasta 8 metros y se mantiene en el aire 3 horas. 🔴LAS MASCARILLAS FFP3 SON IMPRESCINDIBLES!! https:
“Although no studies have directly evaluated the biophysics of droplets and gas cloud formation for patients infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus, several properties of the exhaled gas cloud and respiratory transmission may apply to this pathogen.” The parad
RT @JocelyneBasseal: Turbulent Gas Clouds & Respiratory Pathogen Emissions “Wearing of appropriate personal protection equipment is vitally…
„Skuteczność maski ...Maksymalna prędkość wydechu może dochodzić do 33 do 100 stóp na sekundę (10-30 m / s), tworząc chmurę, która może rozciągać się na około 23 do 27 stóp (7-8 m).” #COVID19 #koronawiruspolska