↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating Progression-Free Survival as a Surrogate Outcome for Health-Related Quality of Life in Oncology: A Systematic Review and Quantitative Analysis.

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Internal Medicine, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
22 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
605 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
Title
Evaluating Progression-Free Survival as a Surrogate Outcome for Health-Related Quality of Life in Oncology: A Systematic Review and Quantitative Analysis.
Published in
JAMA Internal Medicine, December 2018
DOI 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4710
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bruno Kovic, Xuejing Jin, Sean Alexander Kennedy, Mathieu Hylands, Michal Pedziwiatr, Akira Kuriyama, Huda Gomaa, Yung Lee, Morihiro Katsura, Masafumi Tada, Brian Y Hong, Sung Min Cho, Patrick Jiho Hong, Ashley M Yu, Yasmin Sivji, Augustin Toma, Li Xie, Ludwig Tsoi, Marcin Waligora, Manya Prasad, Neera Bhatnagar, Lehana Thabane, Michael Brundage, Gordon Guyatt, Feng Xie

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 605 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 134 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 13%
Student > Master 14 10%
Other 12 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 7%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 54 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 62 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 553. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2023.
All research outputs
#44,997
of 25,928,676 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Internal Medicine
#395
of 11,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#826
of 448,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Internal Medicine
#11
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,928,676 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,749 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 85.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.