| Title |
Self-reported Cannabidiol (CBD) Use for Conditions With Proven Therapies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Network Open, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.20977 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eric C. Leas, Erik M. Hendrickson, Alicia L. Nobles, Rory Todd, Davey M. Smith, Mark Dredze, John W. Ayers |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 17 | 45% |
| Brazil | 4 | 11% |
| Canada | 3 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 8% |
| Japan | 3 | 8% |
| Australia | 2 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 4 | 11% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 61% |
| Scientists | 8 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 96 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 20% |
| Researcher | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 9% |
| Professor | 5 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 21% |
| Unknown | 26 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 17% |
| Psychology | 13 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 17% |
| Unknown | 33 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 230. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2022.
All research outputs
#155,948
of 24,451,685 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Network Open
#1,295
of 8,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,725
of 421,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Network Open
#48
of 431 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,451,685 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,622 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 130.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,031 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 431 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.