↓ Skip to main content

Effects of a Workplace Wellness Program on Employee Health, Health Beliefs, and Medical Use

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Internal Medicine, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
23 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
111 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
242 Mendeley
Title
Effects of a Workplace Wellness Program on Employee Health, Health Beliefs, and Medical Use
Published in
JAMA Internal Medicine, July 2020
DOI 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.1321
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julian Reif, David Chan, Damon Jones, Laura Payne, David Molitor

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 111 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 242 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 242 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 11%
Student > Bachelor 17 7%
Researcher 14 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 4%
Other 44 18%
Unknown 120 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 34 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 10%
Unspecified 9 4%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Psychology 8 3%
Other 32 13%
Unknown 128 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 267. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2023.
All research outputs
#142,802
of 26,385,174 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Internal Medicine
#846
of 11,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,707
of 435,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Internal Medicine
#16
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,385,174 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,851 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 86.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,289 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.