The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 112 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Effects of a Workplace Wellness Program on Employee Health, Health Beliefs, and Medical Use
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Internal Medicine, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.1321 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julian Reif, David Chan, Damon Jones, Laura Payne, David Molitor |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 49 | 44% |
| Canada | 8 | 7% |
| Ireland | 5 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Uganda | 1 | <1% |
| Serbia | 1 | <1% |
| Curaçao | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 35 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 69 | 62% |
| Scientists | 28 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 257 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 257 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 28 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 7% |
| Researcher | 16 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 43 | 17% |
| Unknown | 133 | 52% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 38 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Psychology | 8 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 34 | 13% |
| Unknown | 140 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 268. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2023.
All research outputs
#145,661
of 26,802,760 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Internal Medicine
#853
of 11,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,731
of 435,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Internal Medicine
#16
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,802,760 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,821 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 87.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.