RT @PremedsT: https://t.co/QAc9aaz7K3 https://t.co/NQUacrMHMt (asymptomatic spread) https://t.co/eEvhOyoEnD (Contained spaces, necessitati…
https://t.co/QAc9aaz7K3 https://t.co/NQUacrMHMt (asymptomatic spread) https://t.co/eEvhOyoEnD (Contained spaces, necessitating greater than 6 feet distance) These studies and articles are in direct conflict with the AAMC MCAT testing policy. @AtulGrover
@AAMCtoday @memesMD @AAMC_MCAT https://t.co/LtD7oHPT3x (asymptomatic spread not contained by masks) https://t.co/eEvhOyGfMd (turbulent gas cloud emission in contained spaces, necessitating greater than 6 feet distance) https://t.co/n6FFoa9x0j (for your ed
RT @by_elisa: Important study, published by the Journal of the American Medical Association. Social distancing: 1,5 m (6 feet) will not be…
@ZeligYap Yeah, i found it quite interesting. Here’s another paper in a similar vein. https://t.co/U0pnJUH9Tr
@SassyWineMama Always, even if no one is around. #COVIDー19 can remain airborne for several minutes meaning you could be walking on an empty St where a selfish jogger was running maskless 5 minutes ago and be at risk.This also means safe distance is not 6ft
@QuirkyGirl69 @KrankyKanuck @fordnation @celliottability persistence over which the cloud and its pathogenic payload travel, thus generating an underappreciated potential exposure range for a health care worker.” SOURCE: https://t.co/iZI9ZMLLhF
Turbulent Gas Clouds and Respiratory Pathogen Emissions: Potential Implications for Reducing Transmission of COVID-19 https://t.co/UC6ROPPRg2
@billyallingham @DowneyJD @TheDreamboys @HospoUnion This article also discusses it https://t.co/wedvGxjerJ
https://t.co/jYBbVQlcUq? Turbulent Gas Clouds and Respiratory Pathogen EmissionsPotential Implications for Reducing Transmission of COVID-19 turbulent puff cloud dynamic model may underestimate the distance, timescale, and persistence over which the clou
@Flowerich @ExpediteWealth @salvella If by social distancing you mean 2 meters... Someone forgot to tell droplets about this distance restriction. LOL https://t.co/iZI9ZMLLhF https://t.co/iDvTESEbh3
Some speculate social distancing is due to a 2003 study about SARS transmission on airplanes. ✈️ New research suggests tinier infected droplets can travel 23-27 feet. 😷 Read the full article here: https://t.co/77huMyjLVK. #ReadResearch #StayInformed h
@nickeardleybbc Oh FFS! With all the braying and grandiose oratory style of the ERG loons things are going to be travelling a lot further than two metres. And it’s not exactly a venue designed for swabbing with disinfectant. They need masks and to all have
We did not identify robust data to inform these aspects. ???? https://t.co/neEOLuMpYG https://t.co/KSRtSN4USA https://t.co/VUZ16GqwV4 https://t.co/78T7UGKwD5 https://t.co/iQI8PVnyuj
Apesar da recomendação pra mantermos distância de 1 a 2 metros, o coronavírus pode se espalhar por até 8 metros de distância no ar. Não significa que haverá carga viral suficiente pra ser contaminado, mas pode haver. https://t.co/PEwvFdEEMQ #livecafeeci
@winstoncigar @Firecrazee @trumpytrump @RupertMyers The MIT study came out in march https://t.co/9MrjB8rn1H WHO guides preceded this. I’m not a fluid / particle dynamics researcher so there may be studies in the interim... I suspect the early stuff was bas
Turbulent Gas Clouds and Respiratory Pathogen Emissions https://t.co/2Q3PaJYyte
This is an interesting and detailed paper - but does a stadium with 50k people behave like indoors?
Currently used surgical and N95 masks are not tested for these potential characteristics of respiratory emissions. https://t.co/78T7UGKwD5
protective equipment, should have the ability to repeatedly withstand the kind of high-momentum multiphase turbulent gas cloud that may be ejected during a sneeze or a cough. https://t.co/78T7UGKwD5
wearing of appropriate personal protection equipment is vitally important for health care workers caring for patients who may be infected, even if they are farther than 6 feet away from a patient. https://t.co/78T7UGKwD5
Virus spread. Droplet nuclei may stay suspended in the air for hours, following airflow patterns imposed by ventilation or climate-control systems. https://t.co/78T7UGKwD5
Sneezes & Coughs! Video. Gas Clouds Demonstrate Their Ability to Travel Great Distances https://t.co/78T7UGsVev
#EPP Turbulent Gas Clouds and Respiratory Pathogen Emissions https://t.co/M5W9zJLEOn
@apexsnow @agtmadcat @sbuss @cyantist @LondonBreed It’s not saliva we are worried about buddy. It’s droplets https://t.co/Tm1lBuU6IK
@sbuss @Aaronontheweb If you need to see for yourself how far droplets can travel without a mask: https://t.co/cdDxdnDOj5
@eladgil 27 feet of travel is the longest ever found by scientists, from sneezing, in specific lab conditions. https://t.co/ysYarjmLlW
Turbulent Gas Clouds and Respiratory Pathogen Emissions: Potential Implications for Reducing Transmission of COVID-19 | Infectious Diseases | JAMA | JAMA Network@covid 2019 https://t.co/IiyKFsygvT
@micsolana Maybe the 30 foot rule comes from this, but I'm mostly guessing. "the gas cloud and its payload of pathogen-bearing droplets of all sizes can travel 23 to 27 feet" https://t.co/lPd5XqsePb
@micsolana The 30' number came from here, https://t.co/QU1BGmU6fK where 27' is the maximum recorded projection of a sneeze. They rounded that up to a solid 30' to be easier to remember. This study was in all likelihood conducted indoors in a perfect sett
@supermarke @mrjasonroy This is the study they're basing this on: https://t.co/QU1BGmU6fK 23 - 27ft was the observed max distance of projection from a sneeze. The study was done indoors in a lab though.
@derivativeburke @msutyak 2/? A sneeze can travel 23 - 27 feet in a controlled and optimized setting, https://t.co/QU1BGmU6fK. That test was done inside, with no variables like wind currents and other variables you see outside. I see what DPH did. They
.@brikeilarcnn Please start to dig more on the 6 foot rule. More studies coming out saying it isn’t sufficient and based on 1930 research. https://t.co/jTXUGEf8eI and https://t.co/9efAspyvNR @jaketapper @JohnBerman @jimsciutto @PoppyHarlowCNN @ChrisCuomo @
@BluegrassPundit @KimW_P @KrisOverton @GovAndyBeshear Did you expand it? https://t.co/hfTR2YYqQY https://t.co/hdCKxhzTZD
@RJ_Phoenix16 tell me, is 7-8m a larger or smaller distance than 2m? https://t.co/0HkD02alAd science isn't propaganda. however, being part of a pandemic response rubbishing anti-vax and q-anon adjacent science-denying disinformation campaign is tantamo
@AlanTonelson The six-foot separation is a compromise, based on old research (link). Also, how long does it take for someone to break social distancing? It's happened to me the few times I've gone out. Outside is probably not so important, but anywhere i
@virgo2757 @ElonBachman The statement reflects her deep knowledge of mucosalivary ballistics, the fascinating science of coughing, sneezing and spitting. The discipline was invented by a German doctor in the 19th century and apparently has not made much pr
Just a slight wind of 2.5 mph can spread saliva 26 ft in 5 sec. https://t.co/TPt3BiDINM
@SteveKrak @MollyJongFast @JoeBiden Here is your scientific reason. MIT a research showing Covid can travel 27 feet. https://t.co/pZg9k3Gvgb
@SteveKrak "...recommendations for separations of 3 to 6 feet (1-2 m) may underestimate the distance, timescale, and persistence over which the cloud and its pathogenic payload travel..." https://t.co/W3Zhh2i3ON
The study everyone ignored detailing the spread of particles through the air that signaled the risks os lockdown with other people already infected. https://t.co/SmvrEPQJDP
Everyone should read this Jama article and watch the videos of a sneeze with and without Mask, EVERYONE 👇https://t.co/dSrNSNjAwG
@DAVIDVGOLIATH This is why you should wear a mask in public during the pandemic. Read this! JAMA 2020 https://t.co/dSrNSNjAwG
@conservativevi1 @cdevans06 @DustinFox37 Your complaint is that there is no exact, magical social distance number for COVID?? The experts are trying to balance transmission distance with practicality. A recent study shows COVID can travel up to 27 feet. Bu
Bogus without proven scientific evidence. Just one persons info. Provide the appropriate study that has need published in a major medical journal. Good luck finding that.
@LionelMedia Maybe public health officials should have advocated for masks sooner, but the science is clear: masks can help #FlattenTheCurve #TY4masking Reference: https://t.co/QMlPJ4LwA0
@Raffi_RC Its important to get the science right. Reference: https://t.co/QMlPJ4LwA0
RT @xarkos: @aj502Moonshine @NYCdeb8tr @Alyssa_Milano *Sigh* I just closed down these links. For the 3rd time tonight. People, please learn…
@aj502Moonshine @NYCdeb8tr @Alyssa_Milano *Sigh* I just closed down these links. For the 3rd time tonight. People, please learn to do your own research, I'm tired of doing that for you. https://t.co/D0w17AHwuD https://t.co/wUSBPxCest https://t.co/s5QaWdIx
@Jerbarlow @alwayslissa @S_Foreman @LchNsMnstr @NYCdeb8tr @Alyssa_Milano You've been shown at least two that I've noticed in this conversation. However: https://t.co/FZ3kKl2BKJ https://t.co/D0w17AHwuD https://t.co/q3BJPQr8pq https://t.co/wUSBPxCest https:/
@_beccaharrison @twithaca So my JAMA link shows no correlation to “social distancing” and mask policies to slowing any spread. Could you show science for the social shaming you are involved in? https://t.co/eTZlnu4Jx5 https://t.co/z0rCPgb8CF
Turbulent Gas Clouds and Respiratory Pathogen Emissions Potential Implications for Reducing Transmission of COVID-19 https://t.co/bNEb9EO3Ie
@NYGovCuomo Definitely not SCIENCE At least your telling the truth but it probably more about FEAR. https://t.co/eTZlnu4Jx5 https://t.co/Z9tx4v241r
@HansBoth Onderzoek door het MIT: https://t.co/KTf859iUWC
@SRuhle @MSNBC @carolelee @costareports @RonAllenNBC @BreakingChesky @BillNeelyNBC @KeirSimmons @ianbremmer @SenatorShaheen @profgalloway @KerryNBC Watched the show and the Minnesota hack who cannot fathom the public health reasons for wearing masks needs
@Nieuwsuur Onderzoek in Hong Kong met hamsters toont een reductie van 75% minder kans op verspreiding door mondkapjes. Zie https://t.co/tQBhOR0t21 Ander onderzoek uit maart gepubliceerd in JAMA geeft aan dat maskers noodzakelijk zijn https://t.co/1VIyr51Ab
RT @DavidDavisMP: The argument should not be if 1 metre or 2 metres is safe separation. Neither are if someone coughs or sneezes. It should…
https://t.co/zwUi4i3nR3 Turbulent Gas Clouds and Respiratory Pathogen Emissions Potential Implications for Reducing Transmission of COVID-19
RT @DavidDavisMP: Anybody interested in the erratic advice of the government about wearing masks should read this paper https://t.co/jnknZ8…
RT @DavidDavisMP: On the basis of scientific evidence, it looks to me that there is going to have to be new filtration regulations on air c…
RT @DavidDavisMP: Anybody interested in the erratic advice of the government about wearing masks should read this paper https://t.co/jnknZ8…
I have seen a number of tweets recently saying we should reduce #SocialDistancing to 1 meter, seeing this article shows how dangerous this would be IMO face coverings need to be compulsory on public transport & in enclosed spaces https://t.co/cF6aNlt
RT @DavidDavisMP: On the basis of scientific evidence, it looks to me that there is going to have to be new filtration regulations on air c…
RT @DavidDavisMP: On the basis of scientific evidence, it looks to me that there is going to have to be new filtration regulations on air c…
RT @DavidDavisMP: On the basis of scientific evidence, it looks to me that there is going to have to be new filtration regulations on air c…
RT @DavidDavisMP: On the basis of scientific evidence, it looks to me that there is going to have to be new filtration regulations on air c…
RT @DavidDavisMP: On the basis of scientific evidence, it looks to me that there is going to have to be new filtration regulations on air c…
RT @DavidDavisMP: On the basis of scientific evidence, it looks to me that there is going to have to be new filtration regulations on air c…
RT @DavidDavisMP: Anybody interested in the erratic advice of the government about wearing masks should read this paper https://t.co/jnknZ8…
RT @DavidDavisMP: On the basis of scientific evidence, it looks to me that there is going to have to be new filtration regulations on air c…
Two metres social distancing may not be enough to save you from the CoronaVirus - Turbulent Gas Clouds and Respiratory Pathogen Emissions https://t.co/KuQgmfzCtI
RT @DavidDavisMP: On the basis of scientific evidence, it looks to me that there is going to have to be new filtration regulations on air c…
RT @DavidDavisMP: Anybody interested in the erratic advice of the government about wearing masks should read this paper https://t.co/jnknZ8…
RT @DavidDavisMP: Anybody interested in the erratic advice of the government about wearing masks should read this paper https://t.co/jnknZ8…
RT @DavidDavisMP: On the basis of scientific evidence, it looks to me that there is going to have to be new filtration regulations on air c…
RT @DavidDavisMP: On the basis of scientific evidence, it looks to me that there is going to have to be new filtration regulations on air c…
RT @DavidDavisMP: On the basis of scientific evidence, it looks to me that there is going to have to be new filtration regulations on air c…
RT @DavidDavisMP: On the basis of scientific evidence, it looks to me that there is going to have to be new filtration regulations on air c…
RT @DavidDavisMP: On the basis of scientific evidence, it looks to me that there is going to have to be new filtration regulations on air c…
RT @DavidDavisMP: On the basis of scientific evidence, it looks to me that there is going to have to be new filtration regulations on air c…
RT @DavidDavisMP: On the basis of scientific evidence, it looks to me that there is going to have to be new filtration regulations on air c…
On the basis of scientific evidence, it looks to me that there is going to have to be new filtration regulations on air conditioning units to remove the virus from everything from our office buildings to airplanes.
RT @DavidDavisMP: The argument should not be if 1 metre or 2 metres is safe separation. Neither are if someone coughs or sneezes. It should…
RT @DavidDavisMP: The argument should not be if 1 metre or 2 metres is safe separation. Neither are if someone coughs or sneezes. It should…