↓ Skip to main content

Effect of a Nutritional and Behavioral Intervention on Energy-Reduced Mediterranean Diet Adherence Among Patients With Metabolic Syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
72 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
339 Mendeley
Title
Effect of a Nutritional and Behavioral Intervention on Energy-Reduced Mediterranean Diet Adherence Among Patients With Metabolic Syndrome
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, October 2019
DOI 10.1001/jama.2019.14630
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carmen Sayón-Orea, Cristina Razquin, Mónica Bulló, Dolores Corella, Montserrat Fitó, Dora Romaguera, Jesús Vioque, Ángel M. Alonso-Gómez, Julia Wärnberg, J. Alfredo Martínez, Luís Serra-Majem, Ramón Estruch, Francisco J. Tinahones, José Lapetra, Xavier Pintó, Josep A. Tur, José López-Miranda, Aurora Bueno-Cavanillas, Miguel Delgado-Rodríguez, Pilar Matía-Martín, Lidia Daimiel, Vicente Martín Sánchez, Josep Vidal, Clotilde Vázquez, Emilio Ros, Miguel Ruiz-Canela, José V. Sorlí, Olga Castañer, Miquel Fiol, Eva M. Navarrete-Muñoz, Fernando Arós, Enrique Gómez-Gracia, M. Angeles Zulet, Almudena Sánchez-Villegas, Rosa Casas, Rosa Bernal-López, José M. Santos-Lozano, Emili Corbella, Cristina Bouzas, Ana García-Arellano, Josep Basora, Eva M. Asensio, Helmut Schröder, Manuel Moñino, Manoli García de la Hera, Lucas Tojal-Sierra, Estefanía Toledo, Andrés Díaz-López, Albert Goday, Jordi Salas-Salvadó, Miguel A. Martínez-González

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 72 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 339 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 339 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 10%
Student > Bachelor 33 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 9%
Unspecified 31 9%
Student > Master 24 7%
Other 78 23%
Unknown 107 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 43 13%
Unspecified 31 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 4%
Psychology 11 3%
Other 60 18%
Unknown 130 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 93. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2020.
All research outputs
#397,104
of 23,342,092 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#4,700
of 33,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,440
of 354,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#120
of 363 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,092 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,273 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,970 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 363 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.