↓ Skip to main content

Effect of a Nutritional and Behavioral Intervention on Energy-Reduced Mediterranean Diet Adherence Among Patients With Metabolic Syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
71 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
Title
Effect of a Nutritional and Behavioral Intervention on Energy-Reduced Mediterranean Diet Adherence Among Patients With Metabolic Syndrome
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, October 2019
DOI 10.1001/jama.2019.14630
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carmen Sayón-Orea, Cristina Razquin, Mónica Bulló, Dolores Corella, Montserrat Fitó, Dora Romaguera, Jesús Vioque, Ángel M. Alonso-Gómez, Julia Wärnberg, J. Alfredo Martínez, Luís Serra-Majem, Ramón Estruch, Francisco J. Tinahones, José Lapetra, Xavier Pintó, Josep A. Tur, José López-Miranda, Aurora Bueno-Cavanillas, Miguel Delgado-Rodríguez, Pilar Matía-Martín, Lidia Daimiel, Vicente Martín Sánchez, Josep Vidal, Clotilde Vázquez, Emilio Ros, Miguel Ruiz-Canela, José V. Sorlí, Olga Castañer, Miquel Fiol, Eva M. Navarrete-Muñoz, Fernando Arós, Enrique Gómez-Gracia, M. Angeles Zulet, Almudena Sánchez-Villegas, Rosa Casas, Rosa Bernal-López, José M. Santos-Lozano, Emili Corbella, Cristina Bouzas, Ana García-Arellano, Josep Basora, Eva M. Asensio, Helmut Schröder, Manuel Moñino, Manoli García de la Hera, Lucas Tojal-Sierra, Estefanía Toledo, Andrés Díaz-López, Albert Goday, Jordi Salas-Salvadó, Miguel A. Martínez-González

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 71 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 142 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 16%
Student > Bachelor 17 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 8%
Student > Postgraduate 9 6%
Student > Master 9 6%
Other 43 30%
Unknown 29 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 17%
Unspecified 13 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Sports and Recreations 5 4%
Other 27 19%
Unknown 38 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 95. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2020.
All research outputs
#243,491
of 16,507,667 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#3,662
of 28,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,192
of 275,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#114
of 362 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,507,667 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 28,748 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 362 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.