RT @DrcrNet: Congratulations DRCR Retina Network. Protocol V primary results are in. Effect of Aflibercept, Laser Photocoagulation, or Obse…
Good to see audit data I presented today mirrored this clinical trial data. https://t.co/hFXjJVLfwh
RETINA: #Aflibercept vs #Fotocoagulación Láser vs #Observación en #EdemaMacularDiabético q afecta centro mácula y con buena agudeza visual: Ensayo Clínico Aleatorizado (Protocol V: DRCR Retina Network) Baker CW y col. JAMA 2019; 321 (19): 1880-1894: ht
Common dilemma: central-involving DME with VA at least 20/25. DRCR Protocol V found no difference between observation, laser, and Eylea at 2y. Careful observation is a reasonable approach for these patients. https://t.co/FZOeHvStev
DME + 20/25 = Observation Enriching Primary Eyecare Through Clinical Medicine Cases, Insight, Perspective in my FB group #CME4OD Join here! https://t.co/d6KZUQAAvX #ThinkDeeper #ODPhilosophy #PracticeTheSameProfession #Optometry https://t.co/ggBhTiSzCr
Effect of Aflibercept, Laser Photocoagulation, or Observation on Vision Loss in Diabetic Macular Edema https://t.co/ayOdHG9OgF
RT @frelimpio: Edema macular en diabetes. Tto activo no es mejor que la observación en RCT Effect of Aflibercept, Laser Photocoagulation, o…
RT @tlsophtha: Imprtant work in @JAMA_current No treatment is as good as treatment in patients with foveal edema in patients with #diabet…
RT @frelimpio: Edema macular en diabetes. Tto activo no es mejor que la observación en RCT Effect of Aflibercept, Laser Photocoagulation, o…
Edema macular en diabetes. Tto activo no es mejor que la observación en RCT Effect of Aflibercept, Laser Photocoagulation, or Observation on Vision Loss in Diabetic Macular Edema https://t.co/E4au5FkouV
Imprtant work in @JAMA_current No treatment is as good as treatment in patients with foveal edema in patients with #diabeticretinopathy and good vision. #diabetes #dme #ophthalmology https://t.co/V8uqYwVTEE
RT @JAMA_current: In this randomized trial there was no difference in vision loss at 2 years among patients with diabetic macular edema inv…
En ojos c/edema macular diabético c/afectación central y buena agudeza visual, no habría diferencia en pérdida de visión, hayan sido tratados inicialmente c/aflibercept o c/fotocoagulación láser u observación y aflibercept solo si empeora agudeza visual h
RCT on Clinical approach in Diabetic Macular Edema. Observation without treatment unless visual acuity worsens is a reasonable strategy ( Aflibercept vs Laser Photocoagulation vs Observation). NO benefit of expensive current modalities.. https://t.co/wYXUE
RT @JAMA_current: In this randomized trial there was no difference in vision loss at 2 years among patients with diabetic macular edema inv…
RT @JAMA_current: In this randomized trial there was no difference in vision loss at 2 years among patients with diabetic macular edema inv…
RT @JAMA_current: In this randomized trial there was no difference in vision loss at 2 years among patients with diabetic macular edema inv…
In this randomized trial there was no difference in vision loss at 2 years among patients with diabetic macular edema involving the macular center who had good visual acuity who were given aflibercept, laser photocoagulation, or who were observed. https://
Effect of Aflibercept, Laser Photocoagulation, or Observation on Vision Loss in #Diabetic #Macular #Edema: https://t.co/ayOdHG9OgF
A lot of unanswered questions #UMKCRCT https://t.co/smL3PKem50
A better strategy for treating diabetic macular edema in people with good vision. https://t.co/B0LdCwLUrT https://t.co/11IC8SCNLd
aVEGF vs Laser Photocoagulation vs watchful waiting in early DMO Score draw Important study for treatment thresholds https://t.co/EMmTgWwYXU
https://t.co/rYd5IkVF6V アイリーアとレーザーと経過観察 糖尿病性黄斑浮腫
RT @irodriguezpenin: Effect of Aflibercept, Laser Photocoagulation, or Observation on Vision Loss in Diabetic Macular Edema. ¿Menos es mas?…
https://t.co/tY36qOBPZF source for dibaetic retinopathy study
RT @CristobMorales: https://t.co/bLa8rsGEsS Effect of Initial Management With Aflibercept vs Laser Photocoagulation vs Observation on Visio…
RT @CristobMorales: https://t.co/bLa8rsGEsS Effect of Initial Management With Aflibercept vs Laser Photocoagulation vs Observation on Visio…
RT @CristobMorales: https://t.co/bLa8rsGEsS Effect of Initial Management With Aflibercept vs Laser Photocoagulation vs Observation on Visio…
RT @CristobMorales: https://t.co/bLa8rsGEsS Effect of Initial Management With Aflibercept vs Laser Photocoagulation vs Observation on Visio…
Effect of Aflibercept, Laser Photocoagulation, or Observation on Vision Loss in Diabetic Macular Edema https://t.co/7jLF15e8Ia
Y tanto...🤔👀👀
RT @CristobMorales: https://t.co/bLa8rsGEsS Effect of Initial Management With Aflibercept vs Laser Photocoagulation vs Observation on Visio…
ufff another zasca? Effect of Aflibercept, Laser Photocoagulation, or Observation on Vision Loss in Diabetic Macular Edema https://t.co/eyQWtnBVP0
RT @DrcrNet: Congratulations DRCR Retina Network. Protocol V primary results are in. Effect of Aflibercept, Laser Photocoagulation, or Obse…
https://t.co/bLa8rsGEsS Effect of Initial Management With Aflibercept vs Laser Photocoagulation vs Observation on Vision Loss Among Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema Involving the Center of the Macula and Good Visual Acuity https://t.co/mdDF6mr7Ke
Effect of Aflibercept, Laser Photocoagulation, or Observation on Vision Loss in Diabetic Macular Edema https://t.co/rwQDzNFRMx " Observation without treatment unless visual acuity worsens may be a reasonable strategy for CI-DME"
Effect of Aflibercept, Laser Photocoagulation, or Observation on Vision Loss in Diabetic Macular Edema. ¿Menos es mas? https://t.co/YLMr8tdlNi
Congratulations DRCR Retina Network. Protocol V primary results are in. Effect of Aflibercept, Laser Photocoagulation, or Observation on Vision Loss in Diabetic Macular Edema https://t.co/rkudkJf5f5 #JAMA, #ARVO
RT @JAMA_current: Among eyes with diabetic macularedema involving the macular center and good visual acuity, there was no significant diffe…
RT @JAMA_current: Among eyes with diabetic macularedema involving the macular center and good visual acuity, there was no significant diffe…
RT @JAMA_current: Among eyes with diabetic macularedema involving the macular center and good visual acuity, there was no significant diffe…
RT @JAMA_current: Among eyes with diabetic macularedema involving the macular center and good visual acuity, there was no significant diffe…
RT @JAMA_current: Among eyes with diabetic macularedema involving the macular center and good visual acuity, there was no significant diffe…
Among eyes with diabetic macularedema involving the macular center and good visual acuity, there was no significant difference in vision loss at 2 years whether eyes were initially managed with aflibercept, laser photocoagulation, or observation #ARVO2919