The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Effect of Initial Management With Aflibercept vs Laser Photocoagulation vs Observation on Vision Loss Among Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema Involving the Center of the Macula and Good Visual Acuity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jama.2019.5790 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carl W. Baker, Adam R. Glassman, Wesley T. Beaulieu, Andrew N. Antoszyk, David J. Browning, Kakarla V. Chalam, Sandeep Grover, Lee M. Jampol, Chirag D. Jhaveri, Michele Melia, Cynthia R. Stockdale, Daniel F. Martin, Jennifer K. Sun |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 10% |
| United States | 3 | 8% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 3% |
| Peru | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 30 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 68% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 25% |
| Scientists | 3 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 271 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 271 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 10% |
| Other | 25 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 7% |
| Other | 57 | 21% |
| Unknown | 96 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 102 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 1% |
| Engineering | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 24 | 9% |
| Unknown | 110 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 146. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2020.
All research outputs
#286,791
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#3,616
of 36,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,803
of 365,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#86
of 379 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,771 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 379 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.