↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Initial Management With Aflibercept vs Laser Photocoagulation vs Observation on Vision Loss Among Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema Involving the Center of the Macula and Good Visual…

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
18 news outlets
twitter
40 X users
facebook
12 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
206 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
272 Mendeley
Title
Effect of Initial Management With Aflibercept vs Laser Photocoagulation vs Observation on Vision Loss Among Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema Involving the Center of the Macula and Good Visual Acuity
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, May 2019
DOI 10.1001/jama.2019.5790
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carl W. Baker, Adam R. Glassman, Wesley T. Beaulieu, Andrew N. Antoszyk, David J. Browning, Kakarla V. Chalam, Sandeep Grover, Lee M. Jampol, Chirag D. Jhaveri, Michele Melia, Cynthia R. Stockdale, Daniel F. Martin, Jennifer K. Sun

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 272 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 272 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 10%
Student > Bachelor 26 10%
Other 25 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 8%
Student > Master 20 7%
Other 58 21%
Unknown 96 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 103 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 4%
Engineering 4 1%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 1%
Other 23 8%
Unknown 111 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 146. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2020.
All research outputs
#286,791
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#3,616
of 36,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,803
of 365,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#86
of 379 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,771 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 379 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.