| Title |
Delay of Pregnancy Among Physicians vs Nonphysicians
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Internal Medicine, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.1635 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria C. Cusimano, Nancy N. Baxter, Rinku Sutradhar, Eric McArthur, Joel G. Ray, Amit X. Garg, Simone Vigod, Andrea N. Simpson |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 279 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 94 | 34% |
| Canada | 37 | 13% |
| Mexico | 14 | 5% |
| Australia | 9 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 4 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 1% |
| Spain | 3 | 1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 14 | 5% |
| Unknown | 93 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 175 | 63% |
| Scientists | 56 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 40 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 4 | 13% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Researcher | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 11 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 13 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 328. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2022.
All research outputs
#96,044
of 24,482,039 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Internal Medicine
#595
of 5,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,803
of 432,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Internal Medicine
#13
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,482,039 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,200 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 162.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,305 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.