| Title |
Delay of Pregnancy Among Physicians vs Nonphysicians
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Internal Medicine, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.1635 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria C. Cusimano, Nancy N. Baxter, Rinku Sutradhar, Eric McArthur, Joel G. Ray, Amit X. Garg, Simone Vigod, Andrea N. Simpson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 274 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 92 | 34% |
| Canada | 36 | 13% |
| Mexico | 13 | 5% |
| Australia | 9 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 4 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 1% |
| Spain | 3 | 1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 13 | 5% |
| Unknown | 91 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 171 | 62% |
| Scientists | 53 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 42 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 13% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 19 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 21 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 324. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2022.
All research outputs
#105,800
of 25,791,495 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Internal Medicine
#685
of 11,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,156
of 452,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Internal Medicine
#13
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,495 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,719 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 85.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,655 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.