| Title |
Association of Vitamin D Status and Other Clinical Characteristics With COVID-19 Test Results
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Network Open, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.19722 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David O. Meltzer, Thomas J. Best, Hui Zhang, Tamara Vokes, Vineet Arora, Julian Solway |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,971 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 313 | 16% |
| Germany | 74 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 63 | 3% |
| Canada | 58 | 3% |
| Poland | 48 | 2% |
| India | 37 | 2% |
| Turkey | 33 | 2% |
| France | 27 | 1% |
| Japan | 26 | 1% |
| Other | 236 | 12% |
| Unknown | 1056 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1733 | 88% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 123 | 6% |
| Scientists | 92 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 22 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 653 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 653 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 76 | 12% |
| Researcher | 70 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 64 | 10% |
| Other | 51 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 5% |
| Other | 121 | 19% |
| Unknown | 237 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 164 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 46 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 43 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 29 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 4% |
| Other | 78 | 12% |
| Unknown | 269 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3286. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,771
of 24,514,423 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Network Open
#21
of 8,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117
of 404,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Network Open
#4
of 425 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,514,423 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,682 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 130.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,557 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 425 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.