| Title |
Determination of Brain Death/Death by Neurologic Criteria
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jama.2020.11586 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David M. Greer, Sam D. Shemie, Ariane Lewis, Sylvia Torrance, Panayiotis Varelas, Fernando D. Goldenberg, James L. Bernat, Michael Souter, Mehmet Akif Topcuoglu, Anne W. Alexandrov, Marie Baldisseri, Thomas Bleck, Giuseppe Citerio, Rosanne Dawson, Arnold Hoppe, Stephen Jacobe, Alex Manara, Thomas A. Nakagawa, Thaddeus Mason Pope, William Silvester, David Thomson, Hussain Al Rahma, Rafael Badenes, Andrew J. Baker, Vladimir Cerny, Cherylee Chang, Tiffany R. Chang, Elena Gnedovskaya, Moon-Ku Han, Stephen Honeybul, Edgar Jimenez, Yasuhiro Kuroda, Gang Liu, Uzzwal Kumar Mallick, Victoria Marquevich, Jorge Mejia-Mantilla, Michael Piradov, Sarah Quayyum, Gentle Sunder Shrestha, Ying-ying Su, Shelly D. Timmons, Jeanne Teitelbaum, Walter Videtta, Kapil Zirpe, Gene Sung |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 595 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 128 | 22% |
| Spain | 36 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 34 | 6% |
| Mexico | 27 | 5% |
| Canada | 17 | 3% |
| India | 14 | 2% |
| Italy | 11 | 2% |
| Chile | 10 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 96 | 16% |
| Unknown | 212 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 424 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 96 | 16% |
| Scientists | 65 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 10 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 451 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 451 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 67 | 15% |
| Researcher | 50 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 40 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 31 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 7% |
| Other | 95 | 21% |
| Unknown | 137 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 199 | 44% |
| Neuroscience | 21 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 39 | 9% |
| Unknown | 160 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 562. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2024.
All research outputs
#43,684
of 25,928,676 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#895
of 36,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,576
of 429,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#47
of 396 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,928,676 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 396 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.