| Title |
Presence of Genetic Variants Among Young Men With Severe COVID-19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jama.2020.13719 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Caspar I. van der Made, Annet Simons, Janneke Schuurs-Hoeijmakers, Guus van den Heuvel, Tuomo Mantere, Simone Kersten, Rosanne C. van Deuren, Marloes Steehouwer, Simon V. van Reijmersdal, Martin Jaeger, Tom Hofste, Galuh Astuti, Jordi Corominas Galbany, Vyne van der Schoot, Hans van der Hoeven, Wanda Hagmolen of ten Have, Eva Klijn, Catrien van den Meer, Jeroen Fiddelaers, Quirijn de Mast, Chantal P. Bleeker-Rovers, Leo A. B. Joosten, Helger G. Yntema, Christian Gilissen, Marcel Nelen, Jos W. M. van der Meer, Han G. Brunner, Mihai G. Netea, Frank L. van de Veerdonk, Alexander Hoischen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,597 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 362 | 14% |
| Spain | 210 | 8% |
| Turkey | 120 | 5% |
| Japan | 76 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 71 | 3% |
| Mexico | 65 | 3% |
| India | 40 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 37 | 1% |
| France | 33 | 1% |
| Other | 346 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1237 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2081 | 80% |
| Scientists | 317 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 165 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 33 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 805 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 805 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 116 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 96 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 73 | 9% |
| Other | 54 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 54 | 7% |
| Other | 142 | 18% |
| Unknown | 270 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 157 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 138 | 17% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 58 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 44 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 3% |
| Other | 93 | 12% |
| Unknown | 294 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2555. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2023.
All research outputs
#3,030
of 25,922,020 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#109
of 36,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178
of 428,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#9
of 401 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,922,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 73.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,981 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 401 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.