| Title |
Safety and Efficacy of Apixaban vs Enoxaparin for Preventing Postoperative Venous Thromboembolism in Women Undergoing Surgery for Gynecologic Malignant Neoplasm
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Network Open, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.7410 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Saketh R. Guntupalli, Alyse Brennecke, Kian Behbakht, Anna Tayebnejad, Christopher A. Breed, Lisa Marie Babayan, Georgina Cheng, Amin A. Ramzan, Lindsay J. Wheeler, Bradley R. Corr, Carolyn Lefkowits, Jeanelle Sheeder, Koji Matsuo, Dina Flink |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 160 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 46 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 13 | 8% |
| Canada | 7 | 4% |
| Spain | 6 | 4% |
| Mexico | 5 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 5 | 3% |
| France | 3 | 2% |
| India | 3 | 2% |
| Japan | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Unknown | 58 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 113 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 29 | 18% |
| Scientists | 17 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 161 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 18 | 11% |
| Researcher | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 29 | 18% |
| Unknown | 64 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Unknown | 78 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 114. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2023.
All research outputs
#378,218
of 25,830,005 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Network Open
#2,392
of 9,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,851
of 435,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Network Open
#91
of 389 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,830,005 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,973 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 127.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 389 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.