| Title |
Internet Searches for Unproven COVID-19 Therapies in the United States
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Internal Medicine, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.1764 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael Liu, Theodore L. Caputi, Mark Dredze, Aaron S. Kesselheim, John W. Ayers |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 238 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 63 | 26% |
| Canada | 16 | 7% |
| Spain | 13 | 5% |
| France | 5 | 2% |
| Australia | 5 | 2% |
| Japan | 4 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
| Argentina | 3 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 28 | 12% |
| Unknown | 94 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 150 | 63% |
| Scientists | 42 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 38 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 228 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 228 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 34 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 9% |
| Professor | 18 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 53 | 23% |
| Unknown | 65 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 76 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Psychology | 8 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 43 | 19% |
| Unknown | 75 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1382. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2022.
All research outputs
#8,515
of 24,458,924 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Internal Medicine
#108
of 5,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#445
of 403,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Internal Medicine
#5
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,458,924 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,196 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 162.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,591 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.