↓ Skip to main content

Internet Searches for Unproven COVID-19 Therapies in the United States

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Internal Medicine, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
134 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
185 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions
Title
Internet Searches for Unproven COVID-19 Therapies in the United States
Published in
JAMA Internal Medicine, April 2020
DOI 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.1764
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Liu, Theodore L. Caputi, Mark Dredze, Aaron S. Kesselheim, John W. Ayers

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 185 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1211. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2020.
All research outputs
#3,895
of 15,347,231 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Internal Medicine
#63
of 4,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#459
of 270,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Internal Medicine
#3
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,347,231 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,008 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 133.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.