↓ Skip to main content

Internet Searches for Unproven COVID-19 Therapies in the United States

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Internal Medicine, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
152 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
272 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions
Title
Internet Searches for Unproven COVID-19 Therapies in the United States
Published in
JAMA Internal Medicine, August 2020
DOI 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.1764
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Liu, Theodore L. Caputi, Mark Dredze, Aaron S. Kesselheim, John W. Ayers

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 272 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1405. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2020.
All research outputs
#3,314
of 15,878,730 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Internal Medicine
#52
of 4,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#389
of 280,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Internal Medicine
#1
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,878,730 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,143 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 139.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,247 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.