↓ Skip to main content

Outcomes of Observation vs Stereotactic Ablative Radiation for Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Oncology, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
18 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
236 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
537 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
353 Mendeley
Title
Outcomes of Observation vs Stereotactic Ablative Radiation for Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer
Published in
JAMA Oncology, May 2020
DOI 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.0147
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ryan Phillips, William Yue Shi, Matthew Deek, Noura Radwan, Su Jin Lim, Emmanuel S. Antonarakis, Steven P. Rowe, Ashley E. Ross, Michael A. Gorin, Curtiland Deville, Stephen C. Greco, Hailun Wang, Samuel R. Denmeade, Channing J. Paller, Shirl Dipasquale, Theodore L. DeWeese, Daniel Y. Song, Hao Wang, Michael A. Carducci, Kenneth J. Pienta, Martin G. Pomper, Adam P. Dicker, Mario A. Eisenberger, Ash A. Alizadeh, Maximilian Diehn, Phuoc T. Tran

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 236 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 353 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 353 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 50 14%
Other 42 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 8%
Student > Master 22 6%
Student > Bachelor 22 6%
Other 92 26%
Unknown 98 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 150 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 4%
Unspecified 13 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 2%
Engineering 8 2%
Other 40 11%
Unknown 121 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 292. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2023.
All research outputs
#108,316
of 23,923,788 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Oncology
#202
of 3,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,792
of 381,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Oncology
#3
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,923,788 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,096 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 84.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,143 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.