| Title |
Association Between Maternal Exposure to Magnetic Field Nonionizing Radiation During Pregnancy and Risk of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Offspring in a Longitudinal Birth Cohort
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Network Open, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.1417 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
De-Kun Li, Hong Chen, Jeannette R. Ferber, Andrew K. Hirst, Roxana Odouli |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 30% |
| Canada | 2 | 7% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Denmark | 1 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 63% |
| Scientists | 6 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 64 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 19% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 16% |
| Unknown | 18 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 19% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 14% |
| Psychology | 7 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 19% |
| Unknown | 17 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 103. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2023.
All research outputs
#393,747
of 24,770,025 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Network Open
#2,334
of 8,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,796
of 371,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Network Open
#54
of 362 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,770,025 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,925 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 130.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 362 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.