| Title |
Association of Powder Use in the Genital Area With Risk of Ovarian Cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jama.2019.20079 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katie M. O’Brien, Shelley S. Tworoger, Holly R. Harris, Garnet L. Anderson, Clarice R. Weinberg, Britton Trabert, Andrew M. Kaunitz, Aimee A. D’Aloisio, Dale P. Sandler, Nicolas Wentzensen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 174 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 44 | 25% |
| Malaysia | 16 | 9% |
| Canada | 8 | 5% |
| Japan | 5 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 3 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 3 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| India | 2 | 1% |
| Australia | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 16 | 9% |
| Unknown | 73 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 130 | 75% |
| Scientists | 22 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 20 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 15% |
| Unknown | 23 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 32% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Mathematics | 3 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 24 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1277. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2024.
All research outputs
#10,790
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#287
of 36,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#265
of 480,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#8
of 364 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,882 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 480,505 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 364 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.