| Title |
Long-term Cardiovascular Disease Risk Among Firefighters After the World Trade Center Disaster
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Network Open, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.9775 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hillel W. Cohen, Rachel Zeig-Owens, Cynthia Joe, Charles B. Hall, Mayris P. Webber, Michael D. Weiden, Krystal L. Cleven, Nadia Jaber, Molly Skerker, Jennifer Yip, Theresa Schwartz, David J. Prezant |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 84 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 18 | 21% |
| Thailand | 10 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 4% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Russia | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 41 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 70 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 8% |
| Scientists | 5 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 25 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 18% |
| Unknown | 27 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 679. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2023.
All research outputs
#31,429
of 25,646,963 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Network Open
#328
of 9,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#622
of 351,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Network Open
#8
of 290 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,646,963 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,811 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 128.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 290 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.