↓ Skip to main content

Corticosteroids for Bacterial Keratitis: The Steroids for Corneal Ulcers Trial (SCUT)

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Ophthalmology, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
177 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
Title
Corticosteroids for Bacterial Keratitis: The Steroids for Corneal Ulcers Trial (SCUT)
Published in
JAMA Ophthalmology, October 2011
DOI 10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.315
Pubmed ID
Authors

Muthiah Srinivasan, Jeena Mascarenhas, Revathi Rajaraman, Meenakshi Ravindran, Prajna Lalitha, David V. Glidden, Kathryn J. Ray, Kevin C. Hong, Catherine E. Oldenburg, Salena M. Lee, Michael E. Zegans, Stephen D. McLeod, Thomas M. Lietman, Nisha R. Acharya, for the Steroids for Corneal Ulcers Trial Group

Abstract

To determine whether there is a benefit in clinical outcomes with the use of topical corticosteroids as adjunctive therapy in the treatment of bacterial corneal ulcers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 143 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 18 12%
Researcher 15 10%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 10%
Other 13 9%
Other 32 22%
Unknown 39 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 43 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2013.
All research outputs
#8,261,756
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Ophthalmology
#3,265
of 6,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,302
of 148,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Ophthalmology
#13
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,642 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 148,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.