↓ Skip to main content

How I Was Prescribed an Unnecessary Antibiotic While Traveling to a Conference on Antibiotic Resistance

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Internal Medicine, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
93 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
Title
How I Was Prescribed an Unnecessary Antibiotic While Traveling to a Conference on Antibiotic Resistance
Published in
JAMA Internal Medicine, August 2014
DOI 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.3412
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kevin T. Kavanagh

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 93 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 80. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2016.
All research outputs
#114,723
of 8,445,734 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Internal Medicine
#752
of 2,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,020
of 182,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Internal Medicine
#18
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,445,734 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,675 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 112.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,643 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.