Title |
HIV Prevention in Clinical Care Settings: 2014 Recommendations of the International Antiviral Society–USA Panel
|
---|---|
Published in |
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, July 2014
|
DOI | 10.1001/jama.2014.7999 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jeanne M. Marrazzo, Carlos del Rio, David R. Holtgrave, Myron S. Cohen, Seth C. Kalichman, Kenneth H. Mayer, Julio S. G. Montaner, Darrell P. Wheeler, Robert M. Grant, Beatriz Grinsztejn, N. Kumarasamy, Steven Shoptaw, Rochelle P. Walensky, Francois Dabis, Jeremy Sugarman, Constance A. Benson |
Abstract |
Emerging data warrant the integration of biomedical and behavioral recommendations for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevention in clinical care settings. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 12 | 36% |
Germany | 2 | 6% |
Australia | 2 | 6% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 3% |
Chile | 1 | 3% |
Spain | 1 | 3% |
Colombia | 1 | 3% |
Canada | 1 | 3% |
Peru | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 11 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 22 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 21% |
Scientists | 4 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 290 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 7 | 2% |
Brazil | 3 | 1% |
Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Czechia | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 274 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 51 | 18% |
Researcher | 48 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 10% |
Other | 20 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 18 | 6% |
Other | 62 | 21% |
Unknown | 63 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 110 | 38% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 19 | 7% |
Psychology | 15 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 2% |
Other | 29 | 10% |
Unknown | 85 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 123. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2021.
All research outputs
#347,498
of 25,791,495 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#4,172
of 36,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,895
of 240,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#46
of 375 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,495 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,824 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 375 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.