↓ Skip to main content

HIV Prevention in Clinical Care Settings: 2014 Recommendations of the International Antiviral Society–USA Panel

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
33 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
112 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
291 Mendeley
Title
HIV Prevention in Clinical Care Settings: 2014 Recommendations of the International Antiviral Society–USA Panel
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, July 2014
DOI 10.1001/jama.2014.7999
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeanne M. Marrazzo, Carlos del Rio, David R. Holtgrave, Myron S. Cohen, Seth C. Kalichman, Kenneth H. Mayer, Julio S. G. Montaner, Darrell P. Wheeler, Robert M. Grant, Beatriz Grinsztejn, N. Kumarasamy, Steven Shoptaw, Rochelle P. Walensky, Francois Dabis, Jeremy Sugarman, Constance A. Benson

Abstract

Emerging data warrant the integration of biomedical and behavioral recommendations for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevention in clinical care settings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 291 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 2%
Brazil 3 1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 275 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 18%
Researcher 48 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 10%
Other 21 7%
Student > Bachelor 18 6%
Other 63 22%
Unknown 62 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 111 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 9%
Social Sciences 19 7%
Psychology 15 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 2%
Other 31 11%
Unknown 83 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 123. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2021.
All research outputs
#340,540
of 25,424,630 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#4,124
of 36,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,876
of 239,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#47
of 375 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,424,630 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,469 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 375 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.