| Title |
Internet Searches for Suicide Following the Release of13 Reasons Why
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Internal Medicine, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.3333 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John W. Ayers, Benjamin M. Althouse, Eric C. Leas, Mark Dredze, Jon-Patrick Allem |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 324 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 70 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 20 | 6% |
| Canada | 15 | 5% |
| Spain | 15 | 5% |
| Argentina | 14 | 4% |
| Mexico | 10 | 3% |
| France | 8 | 2% |
| Thailand | 6 | 2% |
| Germany | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 45 | 14% |
| Unknown | 115 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 218 | 67% |
| Scientists | 52 | 16% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 40 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 13 | 4% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 142 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 16% |
| Researcher | 20 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 25 | 18% |
| Unknown | 30 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 26 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 24 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 14% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 23 | 16% |
| Unknown | 41 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1698. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2023.
All research outputs
#5,929
of 24,495,443 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Internal Medicine
#75
of 5,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83
of 320,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Internal Medicine
#4
of 176 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,495,443 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,201 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 162.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 176 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.