↓ Skip to main content

Ten-Year Follow-up of Age-Related Macular Degeneration in the Age-Related Eye Disease Study: AREDS Report No. 36

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Ophthalmology, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
10 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
189 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
234 Mendeley
Title
Ten-Year Follow-up of Age-Related Macular Degeneration in the Age-Related Eye Disease Study: AREDS Report No. 36
Published in
JAMA Ophthalmology, March 2014
DOI 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.6636
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emily Y. Chew, Traci E. Clemons, Elvira Agrón, Robert D. Sperduto, John Paul SanGiovanni, Matthew D. Davis, Frederick L. Ferris

Abstract

Providing long-term follow-up of the natural history of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and associated risk factors will facilitate future epidemiologic studies and clinical trials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 234 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Iceland 1 <1%
Unknown 230 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 12%
Researcher 29 12%
Student > Postgraduate 18 8%
Student > Bachelor 18 8%
Student > Master 16 7%
Other 51 22%
Unknown 73 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 89 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 5%
Unspecified 9 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 3%
Other 20 9%
Unknown 84 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2020.
All research outputs
#3,323,179
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Ophthalmology
#1,508
of 6,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,427
of 236,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Ophthalmology
#21
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,642 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,356 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.