↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Surgical Resection on Survival in Patients With Limited Metastatic Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer: The AIO-FLOT3 Trial

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Oncology, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
49 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
339 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
251 Mendeley
Title
Effect of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Surgical Resection on Survival in Patients With Limited Metastatic Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer: The AIO-FLOT3 Trial
Published in
JAMA Oncology, September 2017
DOI 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.0515
Pubmed ID
Authors

Salah-Eddin Al-Batran, Nils Homann, Claudia Pauligk, Gerald Illerhaus, Uwe M. Martens, Jan Stoehlmacher, Harald Schmalenberg, Kim B. Luley, Nicole Prasnikar, Matthias Egger, Stephan Probst, Helmut Messmann, Markus Moehler, Wolfgang Fischbach, Jörg T. Hartmann, Frank Mayer, Heinz-Gert Höffkes, Michael Koenigsmann, Dirk Arnold, Thomas W. Kraus, Kersten Grimm, Stefan Berkhoff, Stefan Post, Elke Jäger, Wolf Bechstein, Ulrich Ronellenfitsch, Stefan Mönig, Ralf D. Hofheinz

Abstract

Surgical resection has a potential benefit for patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach and gastroesophageal junction. To evaluate outcome in patients with limited metastatic disease who receive chemotherapy first and proceed to surgical resection. The AIO-FLOT3 (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel) trial is a prospective, phase 2 trial of 252 patients with resectable or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Patients were enrolled from 52 cancer care centers in Germany between February 1, 2009, and January 31, 2010, and stratified to 1 of 3 groups: resectable (arm A), limited metastatic (arm B), or extensive metastatic (arm C). Data cutoff was January 2012, and the analysis was performed in March 2013. Patients in arm A received 4 preoperative cycles of fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (FLOT) followed by surgery and 4 postoperative cycles. Patients in arm B received at least 4 cycles of neoadjuvant FLOT and proceeded to surgical resection if restaging (using computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging) showed a chance of margin-free (R0) resection of the primary tumor and at least a macroscopic complete resection of the metastatic lesions. Patients in arm C were offered FLOT chemotherapy and surgery only if required for palliation. Patients received a median (range) of 8 (1-15) cycles of FLOT. The primary end point was overall survival. In total, 238 of 252 patients (94.4%) were eligible to participate. The median (range) age of participants was 66 (36-79) years in arm A (n = 51), 63 (28-79) years in arm B (n = 60), and 65 (23-83) years in arm C (n = 127). Patients in arm B (n = 60) had only retroperitoneal lymph node involvement (27 patients [45%]), liver involvement (11 [18.3%]), lung involvement (10 [16.7%]), localized peritoneal involvement (4 [6.7%]), or other (8 [13.3%]) incurable sites. Median overall survival was 22.9 months (95% CI, 16.5 to upper level not achieved) for arm B, compared with 10.7 months (95% CI, 9.1-12.8) for arm C (hazard ratio, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.25-0.55) (P < .001). The response rate for arm B was 60% (complete, 10%; partial, 50%), which is higher than the 43.3% for arm C. In arm B, 36 of 60 patients (60%) proceeded to surgery. The median overall survival was 31.3 months (95% CI, 18.9-upper level not achieved) for patients who proceeded to surgery and 15.9 months (95% CI, 7.1-22.9) for the other patients. Patients with limited metastatic disease who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and proceeded to surgery showed a favorable survival. The AIO-FLOT3 trial provides a rationale for further randomized clinical trials. clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00849615.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 251 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 250 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 14%
Other 28 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 9%
Student > Postgraduate 20 8%
Student > Bachelor 18 7%
Other 61 24%
Unknown 66 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 136 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 1%
Other 13 5%
Unknown 83 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,040,992
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Oncology
#1,496
of 3,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,053
of 324,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Oncology
#52
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,308 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 84.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.