| Title |
Annular Flaccid Pustules on the Trunk
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Dermatology, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamadermatol.2017.0901 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dimitra Kiritsi, Melika Hoch, Johannes S. Kern |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 29% |
| Mexico | 2 | 10% |
| Peru | 1 | 5% |
| Morocco | 1 | 5% |
| Egypt | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 19% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 86% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 86% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2019.
All research outputs
#3,076,159
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Dermatology
#1,860
of 6,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,133
of 324,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Dermatology
#49
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,496 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.