↓ Skip to main content

Association Between the Probability of Autism Spectrum Disorder and Normative Sex-Related Phenotypic Diversity in Brain Structure

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Psychiatry, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
30 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
twitter
131 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
googleplus
5 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
238 Mendeley
Title
Association Between the Probability of Autism Spectrum Disorder and Normative Sex-Related Phenotypic Diversity in Brain Structure
Published in
JAMA Psychiatry, April 2017
DOI 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.3990
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christine Ecker, Derek S. Andrews, Christina M. Gudbrandsen, Andre F. Marquand, Cedric E. Ginestet, Eileen M. Daly, Clodagh M. Murphy, Meng-Chuan Lai, Michael V. Lombardo, Amber N. V. Ruigrok, Edward T. Bullmore, John Suckling, Steven C. R. Williams, Simon Baron-Cohen, Michael C. Craig, Declan G. M. Murphy

Abstract

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is 2 to 5 times more common in male individuals than in female individuals. While the male preponderant prevalence of ASD might partially be explained by sex differences in clinical symptoms, etiological models suggest that the biological male phenotype carries a higher intrinsic risk for ASD than the female phenotype. To our knowledge, this hypothesis has never been tested directly, and the neurobiological mechanisms that modulate ASD risk in male individuals and female individuals remain elusive. To examine the probability of ASD as a function of normative sex-related phenotypic diversity in brain structure and to identify the patterns of sex-related neuroanatomical variability associated with low or high probability of ASD. This study examined a cross-sectional sample of 98 right-handed, high-functioning adults with ASD and 98 matched neurotypical control individuals aged 18 to 42 years. A multivariate probabilistic classification approach was used to develop a predictive model of biological sex based on cortical thickness measures assessed via magnetic resonance imaging in neurotypical controls. This normative model was subsequently applied to individuals with ASD. The study dates were June 2005 to October 2009, and this analysis was conducted between June 2015 and July 2016. Sample and population ASD probability estimates as a function of normative sex-related diversity in brain structure, as well as neuroanatomical patterns associated with low or high ASD probability in male individuals and female individuals. Among the 98 individuals with ASD, 49 were male and 49 female, with a mean (SD) age of 26.88 (7.18) years. Among the 98 controls, 51 were male and 47 female, with a mean (SD) age of 27.39 (6.44) years. The sample probability of ASD increased significantly with predictive probabilities for the male neuroanatomical brain phenotype. For example, biological female individuals with a more male-typic pattern of brain anatomy were significantly (ie, 3 times) more likely to have ASD than biological female individuals with a characteristically female brain phenotype (P = .72 vs .24, respectively; χ21 = 20.26; P < .001; difference in P values, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.29-0.68). This finding translates to an estimated variability in population prevalence from 0.2% to 1.3%, respectively. Moreover, the patterns of neuroanatomical variability carrying low or high ASD probability were sex specific (eg, in inferior temporal regions, where ASD has different neurobiological underpinnings in male individuals and female individuals). These findings highlight the need for considering normative sex-related phenotypic diversity when determining an individual's risk for ASD and provide important novel insights into the neurobiological mechanisms mediating sex differences in ASD prevalence.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 131 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 238 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 235 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 15%
Student > Bachelor 28 12%
Student > Master 26 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 9%
Other 15 6%
Other 44 18%
Unknown 67 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 49 21%
Neuroscience 37 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 4%
Other 32 13%
Unknown 76 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 376. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2020.
All research outputs
#84,650
of 25,755,403 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Psychiatry
#238
of 5,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,023
of 324,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Psychiatry
#9
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,755,403 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,943 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 71.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.