| Title |
Efficacy of Electronic Cigarettes vs Varenicline and Nicotine Chewing Gum as an Aid to Stop Smoking
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Internal Medicine, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.7846 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hao-Xiang Lin, Zhao Liu, Peter Hajek, Wan-Tong Zhang, Yuan Wu, Bao-Chen Zhu, Hai-Hua Liu, Qiu Xiang, Yan Zhang, Shu-Bin Li, Francesca Pesola, Ying-Ying Wang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 129 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 23 | 18% |
| Australia | 10 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 5% |
| Canada | 6 | 5% |
| Germany | 5 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 5 | 4% |
| Greece | 4 | 3% |
| Japan | 4 | 3% |
| France | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unknown | 50 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 99 | 77% |
| Scientists | 18 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 15% |
| Professor | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
| Researcher | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 54% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 8% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 182. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2024.
All research outputs
#225,114
of 25,756,531 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Internal Medicine
#1,158
of 11,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,890
of 321,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Internal Medicine
#23
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,531 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,712 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 84.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,327 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.