| Title |
Evaluating Artificial Intelligence Responses to Public Health Questions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Network Open, June 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.17517 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John W. Ayers, Zechariah Zhu, Adam Poliak, Eric C. Leas, Mark Dredze, Michael Hogarth, Davey M. Smith |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 22 | 45% |
| Canada | 3 | 6% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 4% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | 2% |
| Sierra Leone | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Singapore | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 17 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 14% |
| Scientists | 6 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Unknown | 17 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 16 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 719. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2024.
All research outputs
#28,617
of 25,637,545 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Network Open
#301
of 9,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#764
of 387,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Network Open
#13
of 560 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,637,545 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,802 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 128.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 560 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.