RT @fake_outlandos: チャット gpt が行う人工的共感(人工知能ベースの共感)が活躍しているという話を聞く機会が増えている. 調べていくと,『公開ソーシャル メディア フォーラムに投稿された患者の質問に対する医師と人工知能チャットボットの応答を比較する』と…
RT @fake_outlandos: チャット gpt が行う人工的共感(人工知能ベースの共感)が活躍しているという話を聞く機会が増えている. 調べていくと,『公開ソーシャル メディア フォーラムに投稿された患者の質問に対する医師と人工知能チャットボットの応答を比較する』と…
チャット gpt が行う人工的共感(人工知能ベースの共感)が活躍しているという話を聞く機会が増えている. 調べていくと,『公開ソーシャル メディア フォーラムに投稿された患者の質問に対する医師と人工知能チャットボットの応答を比較する』という研究があった. https://t.co/KPnPUxP4Hi https://t.co/aECPsN4NyQ
RT @ElarabyMD: sounds interesting 🤔
RT @Pan_Financial: AI is being integrated into many aspects of healthcare, but can an AI chatbot provide empathetic responses to a patient?…
アブストラクトしか読んでないけど、ChatGPTのほうが人間の医者より優れた回答を患者にできるっぽいすねなのだ。 やっぱり医療にもっとAIが進出しないのは医師会が既得権益を守ろうとしてるだけじゃないかなのだ(偏見)。 †悔い改めて† なのだ。 https://t.co/cfacG81WoX
AI is being integrated into many aspects of healthcare, but can an AI chatbot provide empathetic responses to a patient? According to a recent study, the answer is yes! How do you think this could affect the future of patient care? Source: https://t.co/
JAMA Internal Medicine released a report comparing the responses of doctors and ChatGPT to patient’s queries on two dimensions. https://t.co/hOOHLu7sB7 https://t.co/U7EokUjuS8
RT @emollick: Thread on differential diagnosis paper: https://t.co/PDqlzqm4Tm Clinical reasoning paper: https://t.co/b5ZTGaAPmT Empathy p…
RT @JohnWAyersPhD: I take some responsibility for this bc our @AaronGoodman33 study https://t.co/ZKm2KK8C5j but I wholeheartedly agree. AI…
I take some responsibility for this bc our @AaronGoodman33 study https://t.co/ZKm2KK8C5j but I wholeheartedly agree. AI is like the blockchain, big data, social networks, etc. fads of the past where the obsession is w/ the hammer and not the problems it ca
RT @emollick: Thread on differential diagnosis paper: https://t.co/PDqlzqm4Tm Clinical reasoning paper: https://t.co/b5ZTGaAPmT Empathy p…
RT @emollick: Thread on differential diagnosis paper: https://t.co/PDqlzqm4Tm Clinical reasoning paper: https://t.co/b5ZTGaAPmT Empathy p…
Thread on differential diagnosis paper: https://t.co/PDqlzqm4Tm Clinical reasoning paper: https://t.co/b5ZTGaAPmT Empathy paper: https://t.co/JJMCUcW1fH
"The chatbot responses were preferred over physician responses and rated significantly higher for both quality and empathy" - https://t.co/x3B0C4IOtR
ChatGPT, plus empathique que les médecins. 👇 https://t.co/cFqHXwZT0f
@EnriquedeAlava @EricTopol Y de todas formas hay cosas muy interesantes porque tiempo para escuchar y para responder tiene mucho más que nosotros y solo eso ya es muy bien recibido por los pacientes (lo llamemos de una forma u otra) https://t.co/fmfO8rlG6F
Comparing Physician and Chatbot Responses to Patient Questions https://t.co/ZwudixuTkd
RT @JAMAInternalMed: An AI chatbot generated quality & empathetic responses to patient questions posed in an online forum, finds study. Cha…
Comparing Physician and Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Responses to Patient Questions Posted to a Public Social Media Forum | Health Informatics | JAMA Internal Medicine | JAMA Network https://t.co/4jYLTgCYPh
RT @GT_Pluri_SEMI: ¿Cómo podemos usar la inteligencia artificial para ayudar a nuestros pacientes? Reflexionamos con el siguiente artículo:…
RT @GT_Pluri_SEMI: ¿Cómo podemos usar la inteligencia artificial para ayudar a nuestros pacientes? Reflexionamos con el siguiente artículo:…
RT @GT_Pluri_SEMI: ¿Cómo podemos usar la inteligencia artificial para ayudar a nuestros pacientes? Reflexionamos con el siguiente artículo:…
RT @GT_Pluri_SEMI: ¿Cómo podemos usar la inteligencia artificial para ayudar a nuestros pacientes? Reflexionamos con el siguiente artículo:…
RT @GT_Pluri_SEMI: ¿Cómo podemos usar la inteligencia artificial para ayudar a nuestros pacientes? Reflexionamos con el siguiente artículo:…
RT @GT_Pluri_SEMI: ¿Cómo podemos usar la inteligencia artificial para ayudar a nuestros pacientes? Reflexionamos con el siguiente artículo:…
RT @GT_Pluri_SEMI: ¿Cómo podemos usar la inteligencia artificial para ayudar a nuestros pacientes? Reflexionamos con el siguiente artículo:…
RT @GT_Pluri_SEMI: ¿Cómo podemos usar la inteligencia artificial para ayudar a nuestros pacientes? Reflexionamos con el siguiente artículo:…
RT @GT_Pluri_SEMI: ¿Cómo podemos usar la inteligencia artificial para ayudar a nuestros pacientes? Reflexionamos con el siguiente artículo:…
RT @GT_Pluri_SEMI: ¿Cómo podemos usar la inteligencia artificial para ayudar a nuestros pacientes? Reflexionamos con el siguiente artículo:…
¿Cómo podemos usar la inteligencia artificial para ayudar a nuestros pacientes? Reflexionamos con el siguiente artículo: https://t.co/V3fnmS4hRq https://t.co/nBXIq5OenF
Paper for people asking; https://t.co/Hn6UwoRASc
ChatGPT's answers were not only rated as higher "quality", but more EMPATHETIC (by a group of OTHER physicians blinded to who wrote the answers) vs. Reddit’s r/AskDocs. Neat. https://t.co/QyvmNWtR57
RT @srlm: CHATBOTs com IA podem RESPONDER perguntas de PACIENTES com QUALIDADE e EMPATIA comparáveis a MÉDICOS? MELHOR. ESTUDO mostra que…
Really enlightening talk by @BloomPringle on #DrChaTGPT #basl2023 @BASLedu
RT @aelsharkawy75: @BloomPringle discusses this fascinating article on patient preferences to answers from physicians vs #ChatGPT. Patients…
RT @aelsharkawy75: @BloomPringle discusses this fascinating article on patient preferences to answers from physicians vs #ChatGPT. Patients…
@BloomPringle discusses this fascinating article on patient preferences to answers from physicians vs #ChatGPT. Patients preferred the latter. So many things arise from this. This is AI in action today in 2023. @NaultJc #BASL2023 @mustafasuleyman https://
@Delachica ¡El DIÁLOGO es el interfaz universal! No sé si conocías este estudio en el que los autores comparan la experiencia de pacientes atendidos "por humanos" y "por IA". ¿Resultado? Ahem... El 79% prefería la IA porque su respuesta era "mejor y más
@AleksiReito @katri_is @petaman3 @KariTikkinen @NevalainenOlli @markkumyllykan2 Asiasta keskusteltu ohessa. Voit samalla tilastotieteen ammattilaisena tarkistaa, olenko siteerannut tutkimusta oikein. https://t.co/WP1XpCFVJS
It's official, physicians are being replaced by AI. A recent study showed: "The chatbot responses were preferred over physician responses and rated significantly higher for both quality and empathy." https://t.co/0iEOuAkJh4 Us in 5 years: #southpark, #
Un estudio apunta que la inteligencia artificial ya acierta y demuestra mayor empatía que los médicos https://t.co/85pleO2ubk Son capaces de conectarse a todas las novedades que se publican en el mundo, mantenerse actualizadas al minuto y tratar mejor a lo
RT @dchristmas: Oh bugger. If AI can already outperform (some) doctors when responding to patients, we're really going to have to up our ga…
RT @justin_hart: AI's bedside manner is better than your doctors. A chatbot's responses received an average rating of 4.13 for quality, whi…
AI's bedside manner is better than your doctors. A chatbot's responses received an average rating of 4.13 for quality, which is between "good" and "very good". The doctors' responses received an average rating of 3.26, which is "acceptable". https://t.co/C
@rkomatireddy Yet... although, already performing better on empathy. At least rated by other health care professionals. https://t.co/GnBmO32mBA
RT @vallejo_yepes: Comparing Physician and Chatbot Responses to Patient Questions https://t.co/qLlyYp7RJz vía @JAMAInternalMed part of @JAM…
@MedInfluencer https://t.co/dHd6qAHcUx Hier ist AI sogar empathischer. @MedInfluencer
RT @adamatw: Extremely exciting work by @CALonghurst @mdredze and others at @UCSDHealth. Interesting to see that ChatGPT got higher scores…
RT @RoxanaDaneshjou: Chatbots in practice? Trustworthy and reliable? Not dangerous? By the way JAMA desk rejected our paper where we redtea…
Chatbots in practice? Trustworthy and reliable? Not dangerous? By the way JAMA desk rejected our paper where we redteamed multiple large language models and found that they responded with incorrect, race-based medicine responses. https://t.co/f08senSpP2
RT @Mary_Galb: Pictured is Richard Mindham from @escardio #ESCPatientForum presenting the #PatientPerspective at #ESCCongress @Rhythmisit…
RT @JAMA_current: Read the @JAMAInternalMed study mentioned during this morning’s #ESCCongress session on AI chatbots. https://t.co/ucQVJ…
RT @JAMA_current: Read the @JAMAInternalMed study mentioned during this morning’s #ESCCongress session on AI chatbots. https://t.co/ucQVJ…
RT @JAMA_current: Read the @JAMAInternalMed study mentioned during this morning’s #ESCCongress session on AI chatbots. https://t.co/ucQVJ…
Read the @JAMAInternalMed study mentioned during this morning’s #ESCCongress session on AI chatbots. https://t.co/ucQVJj9V3k JAMA recently issued a call for papers on AI in medicine. Learn more. https://t.co/Yute4lnTJG #ESC23 https://t.co/oflvnUWMxd
RT @MotyKatzman: Ouch! https://t.co/s0j2BDynLO
RT @KE_Gallaway: @YaleCancer discusses the potential applications of natural language processing to assist in the diagnostic process. One…
@YaleCancer discusses the potential applications of natural language processing to assist in the diagnostic process. One study showed chatbot responses were rated higher in both quality and empathy than physicians! 😲 https://t.co/8lkPtMSZUO #DAVAHawaiiBr
RT @EricTopol: Noteworthy: a new study comparing #ChatGPT vs doctors for responding to patient queries demonstrated clearcut superiority of…
@Wirlander @sophieloehde Hendes ide er givetvis bygger på det her studie der blandt andet viser at den slår (amerikanske) læger jævnt meget på empati… ikke at det skaber mere personale, og Danske politikere får med garanti fucket det op alligevel https://t
RT @EricTopol: Noteworthy: a new study comparing #ChatGPT vs doctors for responding to patient queries demonstrated clearcut superiority of…
@icreatelife Ai has been shown to be extremely empathetic, humanity will benefit from this https://t.co/Dd7JrR7zqv
@espinosacrim @Gbrl_Barcenas @qualcomputing 7/ Otra cosa es que al hacer preguntas clínicas, ChatGPT obtuvo la preferencia de los encuestados, generó respuestas más empáticas y de buena calidad cuando se compra con el desempeño de un doctor (aunque obvio,
RT @whyarethis: @cajundiscordian @SashaMTL There is some work coming out: https://t.co/sF0OSOb28C
@bradpwyble @gfodor this one made the biggest splash https://t.co/c8u7eZlXpA but im not your researcher
RT @srlm: CHATBOTs com IA podem RESPONDER perguntas de PACIENTES com QUALIDADE e EMPATIA comparáveis a MÉDICOS? MELHOR. ESTUDO mostra que…
RT @srlm: CHATBOTs com IA podem RESPONDER perguntas de PACIENTES com QUALIDADE e EMPATIA comparáveis a MÉDICOS? MELHOR. ESTUDO mostra que…
@cajundiscordian @SashaMTL There is some work coming out: https://t.co/sF0OSOb28C
RT @srlm: CHATBOTs com IA podem RESPONDER perguntas de PACIENTES com QUALIDADE e EMPATIA comparáveis a MÉDICOS? MELHOR. ESTUDO mostra que…
RT @srlm: CHATBOTs com IA podem RESPONDER perguntas de PACIENTES com QUALIDADE e EMPATIA comparáveis a MÉDICOS? MELHOR. ESTUDO mostra que…
RT @srlm: CHATBOTs com IA podem RESPONDER perguntas de PACIENTES com QUALIDADE e EMPATIA comparáveis a MÉDICOS? MELHOR. ESTUDO mostra que…
RT @srlm: CHATBOTs com IA podem RESPONDER perguntas de PACIENTES com QUALIDADE e EMPATIA comparáveis a MÉDICOS? MELHOR. ESTUDO mostra que…
RT @srlm: CHATBOTs com IA podem RESPONDER perguntas de PACIENTES com QUALIDADE e EMPATIA comparáveis a MÉDICOS? MELHOR. ESTUDO mostra que…
RT @srlm: CHATBOTs com IA podem RESPONDER perguntas de PACIENTES com QUALIDADE e EMPATIA comparáveis a MÉDICOS? MELHOR. ESTUDO mostra que…
RT @srlm: CHATBOTs com IA podem RESPONDER perguntas de PACIENTES com QUALIDADE e EMPATIA comparáveis a MÉDICOS? MELHOR. ESTUDO mostra que…
RT @srlm: CHATBOTs com IA podem RESPONDER perguntas de PACIENTES com QUALIDADE e EMPATIA comparáveis a MÉDICOS? MELHOR. ESTUDO mostra que…
Also important work. Clearly we still need to work on our communication with patients.
RT @JonathanShedler: How can anyone possibly fail to see that answering medical questions on a social media forum has literally nothing to…
@MaratusSceletus You don’t code it, it comes naturally training large language models
RT @kaetn: Comparing Physician and Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Responses to Patient Questions Posted to a Public Social Media Forum | H…
RT @TamarHaspel: Researchers pittted ChatGPT against genuine doctors, using actual patient questions. ChatGPT was more accurate and more e…
Comparing Physician and Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Responses to Patient Questions Posted to a Public Social Media Forum | Health Informatics | JAMA Internal Medicine | JAMA Network https://t.co/NQpEm2AhIZ
速く帰れオーラも出さないし、予約しても待たされないからなー
RT @CeoImed: 何と! 「医師よりChatGPTの方が患者さんに好まれる!?」 JAMA Internal Medicine ・ 195件の患者の質問に対し、医師とChatGPTの回答を比較 ・ 質・共感ともにChatGPTの方が高く評価された(下図) ・ 現…
RT @ContinuumPharma: Comparing Physician and Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Responses to Patient Questions Posted to a Public Social Media…
Comparing Physician and Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Responses to Patient Questions Posted to a Public Social Media Forum | Health Informatics | JAMA Internal Medicine | JAMA Network https://t.co/i0MZanM9o8
RT @LizGhandakly: This study is fascinating. In examining whether AI could provide responses to patients of comparable quality/empathy to t…
This study is fascinating. In examining whether AI could provide responses to patients of comparable quality/empathy to those written by physicians, the proportion of responses rated empathetic/very empathetic was significantly higher for AI than for docs.
RT @TamarHaspel: Researchers pittted ChatGPT against genuine doctors, using actual patient questions. ChatGPT was more accurate and more e…