The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 84 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Effect of Fractional Carbon Dioxide vs Sham Laser on Sexual Function in Survivors of Breast Cancer Receiving Aromatase Inhibitors for Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Network Open, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.55697 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eduard Mension, Inmaculada Alonso, Sònia Anglès-Acedo, Cristina Ros, Jorge Otero, Álvaro Villarino, Ramon Farré, Adela Saco, Naiara Vega, Natalia Castrejón, Jaume Ordi, Natalia Rakislova, Marta Tortajada, Isabel Matas, Sílvia Gómez, Laura Ribera, Camil Castelo-Branco |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 8% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Comoros | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 73 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 56 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 18% |
| Scientists | 11 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
| Researcher | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 16% |
| Unknown | 30 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 30 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 140. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2024.
All research outputs
#318,676
of 26,595,536 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Network Open
#2,215
of 10,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,876
of 500,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Network Open
#136
of 529 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,595,536 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,820 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 128.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 500,084 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 529 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.