↓ Skip to main content

The Mycotic Ulcer Treatment Trial

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Ophthalmology, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
262 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
198 Mendeley
Title
The Mycotic Ulcer Treatment Trial
Published in
JAMA Ophthalmology, April 2013
DOI 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.1497
Pubmed ID
Authors

N. Venkatesh Prajna, Tiruvengada Krishnan, Jeena Mascarenhas, Revathi Rajaraman, Lalitha Prajna, Muthiah Srinivasan, Anita Raghavan, Catherine E. Oldenburg, Kathryn J. Ray, Michael E. Zegans, Stephen D. McLeod, Travis C. Porco, Nisha R. Acharya, Thomas M. Lietman, for the Mycotic Ulcer Treatment Trial Group

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Peru 1 <1%
Unknown 197 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 11%
Student > Postgraduate 21 11%
Student > Master 19 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 9%
Other 42 21%
Unknown 60 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 88 44%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Other 12 6%
Unknown 66 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2023.
All research outputs
#6,256,551
of 23,485,296 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Ophthalmology
#1,883
of 3,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,787
of 201,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Ophthalmology
#16
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,485,296 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,599 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.1. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.