The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 156 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Pokémon GO—A New Distraction for Drivers and Pedestrians
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Internal Medicine, December 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.6274 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John W. Ayers, Eric C. Leas, Mark Dredze, Jon-Patrick Allem, Jurek G. Grabowski, Linda Hill |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 55 | 35% |
| United Kingdom | 11 | 7% |
| Japan | 8 | 5% |
| Spain | 5 | 3% |
| Canada | 5 | 3% |
| Mexico | 4 | 3% |
| Thailand | 3 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 3 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Unknown | 48 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 102 | 65% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 25 | 16% |
| Scientists | 24 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 93 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 16% |
| Researcher | 12 | 12% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 17 | 17% |
| Unknown | 14 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 20% |
| Computer Science | 11 | 11% |
| Engineering | 8 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 8% |
| Psychology | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 25% |
| Unknown | 21 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 829. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2019.
All research outputs
#23,963
of 26,466,900 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Internal Medicine
#237
of 11,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#439
of 420,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Internal Medicine
#11
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,466,900 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,716 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 87.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,950 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.