| Title |
Pokémon GO—A New Distraction for Drivers and Pedestrians
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Internal Medicine, December 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.6274 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John W. Ayers, Eric C. Leas, Mark Dredze, Jon-Patrick Allem, Jurek G. Grabowski, Linda Hill |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 159 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 51 | 32% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 6% |
| Japan | 8 | 5% |
| Canada | 5 | 3% |
| Mexico | 4 | 3% |
| Spain | 4 | 3% |
| Thailand | 3 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 3 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Unknown | 56 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 107 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 25 | 16% |
| Scientists | 25 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 92 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 16% |
| Researcher | 12 | 12% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 17 | 17% |
| Unknown | 13 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 20% |
| Computer Science | 11 | 11% |
| Engineering | 8 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 8% |
| Psychology | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 26% |
| Unknown | 20 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 830. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2021.
All research outputs
#20,606
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Internal Medicine
#203
of 5,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#419
of 425,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Internal Medicine
#12
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,185 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 162.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.