The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 725 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Effect of Pain Reprocessing Therapy vs Placebo and Usual Care for Patients With Chronic Back Pain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Psychiatry, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.2669 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yoni K. Ashar, Alan Gordon, Howard Schubiner, Christie Uipi, Karen Knight, Zachary Anderson, Judith Carlisle, Laurie Polisky, Stephan Geuter, Thomas F. Flood, Philip A. Kragel, Sona Dimidjian, Mark A. Lumley, Tor D. Wager |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 106 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 42 | 6% |
| Canada | 16 | 2% |
| Spain | 14 | 2% |
| Australia | 11 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 5 | <1% |
| Mexico | 5 | <1% |
| Germany | 4 | <1% |
| Japan | 4 | <1% |
| Other | 31 | 4% |
| Unknown | 487 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 433 | 60% |
| Scientists | 185 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 89 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 12 | 2% |
| Unknown | 6 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 404 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 404 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 38 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 38 | 9% |
| Researcher | 35 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 5% |
| Other | 81 | 20% |
| Unknown | 158 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 52 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 12% |
| Psychology | 44 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 25 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 51 | 13% |
| Unknown | 173 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1816. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2024.
All research outputs
#5,833
of 26,378,208 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Psychiatry
#20
of 6,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#293
of 531,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Psychiatry
#1
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,378,208 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,008 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 73.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 531,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.