↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Pain Reprocessing Therapy vs Placebo and Usual Care for Patients With Chronic Back Pain

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Psychiatry, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#19 of 5,927)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
374 Mendeley
Title
Effect of Pain Reprocessing Therapy vs Placebo and Usual Care for Patients With Chronic Back Pain
Published in
JAMA Psychiatry, January 2022
DOI 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.2669
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yoni K. Ashar, Alan Gordon, Howard Schubiner, Christie Uipi, Karen Knight, Zachary Anderson, Judith Carlisle, Laurie Polisky, Stephan Geuter, Thomas F. Flood, Philip A. Kragel, Sona Dimidjian, Mark A. Lumley, Tor D. Wager

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 716 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 374 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 374 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 38 10%
Researcher 34 9%
Student > Master 31 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 6%
Other 74 20%
Unknown 145 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 49 13%
Psychology 40 11%
Neuroscience 23 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 2%
Other 44 12%
Unknown 159 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1785. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2024.
All research outputs
#5,747
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Psychiatry
#19
of 5,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#285
of 517,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Psychiatry
#1
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,927 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 70.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 517,261 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.