↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Intravitreous Anti–Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor vs Sham Treatment for Prevention of Vision-Threatening Complications of Diabetic Retinopathy

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Ophthalmology, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
Title
Effect of Intravitreous Anti–Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor vs Sham Treatment for Prevention of Vision-Threatening Complications of Diabetic Retinopathy
Published in
JAMA Ophthalmology, July 2021
DOI 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.0606
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raj K. Maturi, Adam R. Glassman, Kristin Josic, Andrew N. Antoszyk, Barbara A. Blodi, Lee M. Jampol, Dennis M. Marcus, Daniel F. Martin, Michele Melia, Hani Salehi-Had, Cynthia R. Stockdale, Omar S. Punjabi, Jennifer K. Sun

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 87 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Researcher 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Student > Master 5 6%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 44 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 48 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 303. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2021.
All research outputs
#114,075
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Ophthalmology
#79
of 6,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,436
of 445,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Ophthalmology
#1
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,643 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.