The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Why Physicians Should Oppose Assisted Suicide
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jama.2015.16194 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Y. Tony Yang, Farr A. Curlin |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 24% |
| Canada | 6 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 7% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 27 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33 | 61% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 20% |
| Scientists | 8 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 93 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 18% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Researcher | 5 | 5% |
| Professor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 25% |
| Unknown | 15 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 16% |
| Unknown | 15 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 184. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2018.
All research outputs
#228,599
of 26,189,645 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#3,063
of 37,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,827
of 406,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#53
of 384 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,189,645 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 37,235 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,031 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 384 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.