| Title |
Case Rates, Treatment Approaches, and Outcomes in Acute Myocardial Infarction During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Cardiology, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.3629 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ty J. Gluckman, Michael A. Wilson, Shih-Ting Chiu, Brian W. Penny, Vinaya B. Chepuri, John W. Waggoner, Kateri J. Spinelli |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 256 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Turkey | 41 | 16% |
| United States | 37 | 14% |
| Japan | 7 | 3% |
| Brazil | 5 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
| Argentina | 3 | 1% |
| Spain | 3 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 17 | 7% |
| Unknown | 136 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 222 | 87% |
| Scientists | 18 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 159 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 13% |
| Other | 20 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 23 | 14% |
| Unknown | 47 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 64 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 2% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 10% |
| Unknown | 53 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 460. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2023.
All research outputs
#60,481
of 25,722,279 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Cardiology
#71
of 2,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,844
of 527,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Cardiology
#4
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,722,279 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,165 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 94.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 527,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.