| Title |
Positron Emission Tomography Imaging of Poly–(Adenosine Diphosphate–Ribose) Polymerase 1 Expression in Breast Cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Oncology, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.0334 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elizabeth S. McDonald, Robert K. Doot, Austin R. Pantel, Michael D. Farwell, Robert H. Mach, Kara N. Maxwell, David A. Mankoff |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 19 | 43% |
| Australia | 2 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 18 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 70% |
| Scientists | 6 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 11% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 7% |
| Librarian | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 13 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,437,653
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Oncology
#1,830
of 3,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,948
of 433,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Oncology
#54
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,308 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 84.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,800 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.