@PleaseSavemich I got bad news for you https://t.co/jqpUsaMwhG It's time to write your will buddy, you're gonna die
@UnchartedWorlds @Dajcart84 @aftab_usa Those don’t either https://t.co/zfdyV3gY56.
@COVID19_disease RCT - N95 vs Loose Surgical Mask for Influenza Participants were trained medical workers - worn around patients - when most exposed Not worn during low exposure - on break or at home No stat sig difference in infection Published Sept
@aftab_usa Meanwhile, back in reality: https://t.co/ByvJLajIbS
@BalkemaLynne @MJJ_1989 @MrRisun Run a poll. Find out how many people changed their mask routinely during the day. I’ll just leave this little nugget showing n95 did not prevent influenza infection. Lol But you be you. https://t.co/Hb9llBqaBM
@salamasinamusic @Ted21830738 Do tell, and advise @JAMA_current also: https://t.co/BuMfzeuHxW
@Usansan10 1つコロナ前の2019年に出た論文を。医療従事者によるN95対サージカルマスクのRCTが行われた結果、N95はサージカルに優位を示せなかった。 また、N95の成功例を示す論文がコロナの初期の初期を除くと全然出てきていないのも私がN95はダメとみる理由。 https://t.co/JRSepWDVsu
@yoscienceyo @lexisrex2 @COVID19_disease Nope "There was no significant difference in the incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza among health care personnel with the use of N95 respirators (8.2%) vs medical masks (7.2%)." https://t.co/Gpq3kh4Ctt
@greg_travis @BenK_Data Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers https://t.co/82BDVqvyce https://t.co/pG4OeZrdo0 https://t.co/dhctj9QjSa https://t.co/URfCKLvfVC
@DeborahDuffin @aftab_usa @ELHopkins Their friends and family need to do no such thing because Aftab is fabricating this story in order to virtue signal. He has no interest in actual science. https://t.co/BuMfzeuHxW
@dregenus @ChanasitJonas @PSHolstein Die Nase ändert nicht viel an der Dynamik. Wegen der Leckagen auch bei korrektem Tragen beträgt der Unterschied nur wenige Prozent. FFP2/N95 sind statistisch selbst bei geschultem Personal nicht sicherer. Es fehlt der
@ChanasitJonas für medizinisches Personal ist mE auch nix mit FFP2 zu holen es gibt verblindete Studien mit dem besagten Personenkreis, Masken wurden fit-tested unter Anleitung getragen
@TobySabol @LismynameHp @SuzanneReads @QuackDetector RCT shows N95 performs no better than surgical masks. Basically useless. https://t.co/ByvJLajIbS Walk into a BSL-4 lab with only an N95, please.
@psalm0433 @MakisMD Trust the science, right?! https://t.co/XFZEfSLoca
@SARS_CoV_2_2K19 @ModelAyshaMirza Yeah, uh no. An actual RCT (not mechanistic modeling) showed no difference against aersolized pathogens. As in, ineffective. https://t.co/ByvJLajIbS I worked in a BSL-3 laboratory, and if you really believe that we were f
@seeingkrungthep @chav_khun No goal posts moved my friend. I asked for one country that had a significant decrease in Covid cases after masks were mandated. You can't tell me one because nowhere did. Numerous studies have been done re the effectiveness of
@shion__gbf @PDTH3ahqRCrVri7 https://t.co/JRSepWDnCW コロナ前のインフルエンザ、医療従事者でサージカルマスクvs.N95マスクのRCT。N95が対サージカルで結果を残せなかった。これは、隙間なく着けても、一般的な双方向フィルターだとダメということ?
@BarryHunt008 Sure bud. https://t.co/XFZEfSKQmC
@BenK_Data N95 masks are no different from surgical ones when it comes to respiratory infections. All u will get is even more difficulty breathing, headaches, dizziness etc. all these null RCTs mean mask mandates are not evidence based & thus inappropr
@DrEleanore1 You are in a cult. Wake up. https://t.co/tsfQicj4un
@NohaAboelataMD Your cult has been unmasked. Both figuratively and literally. https://t.co/tsfQicj4un
@jvipondmd Joe,every high quality study, systematic review and meta analysis have shown N95 respirators to be as useful as surgical masks, no significant benefit. https://t.co/aGgXZmlLFY https://t.co/7LJc9zfIIN
@Hollaworldwide @SymoneDSanders @DrJasonJohnson @MichaelSteele @thereidout @maddow Here’s another one
@scott_squires Nope. Masks are not effective against viruses. They are an effective Talisman however. https://t.co/6zeU21tcUP
@gorskon Of course you would https://t.co/7LJc9zfIIN
The CDC noted that a 2019 study in JAMA compared N95 respirators to medical masks and found “no significant difference.” #mask https://t.co/NfTmuqXiP4 #SaturdayMorning #Covid_19 #SaturdayVibes #SaturdayMood
N95とサージカルの感染率が逆転しちゃってる研究もあるからね。 https://t.co/Is9fFgFc1F
@sextoyspolitics there was no significant difference in the incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza among health care personnel with the use of N95 respirators (8.2%) vs medical masks (7.2%) https://t.co/Gpq3kh4Ctt
@andlivs2 @AnnadeBuisseret @Sandyboots2020 clinical trial involving 2862 health care personnel, there was no significant difference in the incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza among health care personnel with the use of N95 respirators (8.2%) vs med
@denpamonkey39ra ●N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel https://t.co/zXXYcdRoxC ●Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masks against influenza: A systematic review and meta-analysis https://t.co/V
RT @thackerpd: @RonChusid @jvipondmd @DFisman @JanelleMMenard @SarahSchaferMD @ColinKinner @profesterman Do you mean this study in JAMA tha…
RT @thackerpd: @RonChusid @jvipondmd @DFisman @JanelleMMenard @SarahSchaferMD @ColinKinner @profesterman Do you mean this study in JAMA tha…
@RonChusid @jvipondmd @DFisman @JanelleMMenard @SarahSchaferMD @ColinKinner @profesterman Do you mean this study in JAMA that found no difference? https://t.co/LKFNwnEkPs Or this study in Annals of Internal Medicine that had similar findings? https://t.co
@DrJBhattacharya old knowledge, really old knowledge
@BabsSheKing @TrophyHusband56 @urbanmel Science isn't a good reason? Among outpatient health care personnel, N95 respirators vs medical masks as worn by participants in this trial resulted in no significant difference in the incidence of laboratory-conf
@urbanmel "Protecting themselves" lol Why do you hate science so much? https://t.co/E2TAN7CIzW
@wonderartsy Meanwhile, in science...N95 masks "resulted in no significant difference in the rates of laboratory-confirmed influenza" among HCWs working with patients vs medical masks. https://t.co/E2TAN7CIzW
@markdixontweets @mchristinebd You've got some misinformation here, well-fitted N95 masks don't help protect the wearer or the group from respiratory viruses and "resulted in no significant difference in the rates of laboratory-confirmed influenza" vs medi
RT @Gabrigrifo1: @MatteoF1989 @Libero_Pensier @GandolfoDomini1 @Ale74terni Studi pre 2019 per mascherine contro influenza,per questo nessun…
@MatteoF1989 @Libero_Pensier @GandolfoDomini1 @Ale74terni Studi pre 2019 per mascherine contro influenza,per questo nessuno le portava in ospedale...vado avanti o oltre alla realtà di tutta Europa le serve altro per capire?https://t.co/iEELQ7DtAC
@GeorgeMonbiot If N95s have never been proven as effective at preventing influenza then why do you think they are for Covid?… At the very least these studies show no difference between medical masks and N95s so why the insincere posturing? https://t.co
RT @kevinnbass: Mask mandates are returning. Let us review a 2019 clinical trial from JAMA. No difference in rate of influenza infections…
RT @kevinnbass: Mask mandates are returning. Let us review a 2019 clinical trial from JAMA. No difference in rate of influenza infections…
@mbruggelivecom1 @kate__said @DSEDunn I disagree regarding N95 masks. This clinical trial shows their relative ineffectiveness, and this was amongst trained medical professionals. https://t.co/W7vOUBwuzf
@davideyoungmd @sco0psmcgoo @IanCopeland5 there was no significant difference in the incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza among health care personnel with the use of N95 respirators (8.2%) vs medical masks (7.2%). https://t.co/Gpq3kh4Ctt
@preternaturalia @100_strim14410 No hay diferencia alguna en utilizar FFP2 o quirúrgicas. Hay evidencia al respecto. https://t.co/ULojPXE5Iz
@bbotfadeaway @ztisdale If they are useless for influenza virus they are useless against covid https://t.co/7LJc9zfIIN
@DrEricDing @JohnsHopkins Definition of insanity right here! #MasksDontWork Something wrong with your common sense or what!? 🖕 https://t.co/Wtky5yKJRP https://t.co/Gpq3kh4Ctt
@Laurie_Garrett Never gonna happen again! They don't work! Or are you to stupid to see that!? Watch out when you ask people they have to wear one! Not gonna end well for the one that asked. https://t.co/Wtky5yKJRP https://t.co/Gpq3kh4Ctt
@jasmith_yorku No it doesn't See a shrink! Gonna be a tough case. https://t.co/Gpq3kh4Ctt
@FlaGirlInThePNW @BradSCPat @KING5Seattle risks from masks and that they offer NO protection 1. https://t.co/9roM1uWpZg 2. https://t.co/XjURh2sz5o 3. https://t.co/Exb29J9Isx 4. https://t.co/86JvtlKJjg 5. https://t.co/sAWC4sly8C 6. https://t.co/YW38wf
@RTRogs71 @stopvaccinating @merlot_sk @naomirwolf except they don't https://t.co/59PWundvJG
@scott_squires A RESPIRATORY disease! And that meme describes effects from the vax! https://t.co/wC6zGBg30G Also, some mask studies that didn't have a political retraction!(The government can't coerce every editor into complying, can they?) https://t.co/Wt
@aftab_usa there was no significant difference in the incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza among health care personnel with the use of N95 respirators (8.2%) vs medical masks (7.2%). https://t.co/Gpq3kh4Ctt
@PCLong1 @oregoncitizen_ A 2019 study of 2862 participants showed that both N95 respirators and surgical masks “resulted in no significant difference in the incidence of laboratory confirmed influenza.” https://t.co/X8C1fWxW9Z
@CollapseAcademy @BarryHunt008 @IPACCanada Oh, you sure about that? What do you bring to the table to make your claim!? IFR Covid for the first variants till end of 2020 was 0.095% for 0-69 years(Flu 0.16%) https://t.co/nKwziIRnOX And a few mask studies
@CarlosTrevejo @Jartitameteneis @tasty4ever1 Tienes evidencia sobre las mascarillas quirúrgicas vs N95 mostrando nulas diferencias. https://t.co/ULojPXE5Iz
@Marco_Esp_Ita @ituerahipster @albertoortegana @scipio91 @LMBooster Tienes este estudio experimental https://t.co/DSUNaoVXsR y ensayo clínico en personal sanitario de mascarillas de tela vs. quirúrgicas https://t.co/1PrNoHRZST y mascarillas quirúrgicas vs.
@Chris_SactoCA @Boden4Craig Denmark, Spain, and Bangladesh mask studies all failed to find any effect whatsoever and Finland study showed masks actually increased the rate of infection. https://t.co/bzf1HiWu52
RT @Placeb0Mad: @MiguelJaraBlog @sixtasiles Especifica que las FFP2 son igual de inútiles que las quirúrgicas. https://t.co/ULojPXE5Iz
@BarryHunt008 @Ninjazz636 @IPACCanada Meanwhile, in science...N95s made no difference (again) https://t.co/E2TAN7CIzW
@MiguelJaraBlog @sixtasiles Especifica que las FFP2 son igual de inútiles que las quirúrgicas. https://t.co/ULojPXE5Iz
@MrCelerius Masks don’t work. And why waste time testing for a virus which now has a lower risk than the 2018 seasonal flu had? https://t.co/tsfQicj4un
@MA_Campano Chamanismo. https://t.co/ULojPXE5Iz
@IncredulousCan2 @CaulfieldTim Get help with understanding science. https://t.co/E2TAN7CIzW
@YouAreLobbyLud there was no significant difference in the incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza among health care personnel with the use of N95 respirators (8.2%) vs medical masks (7.2%). https://t.co/Gpq3kh4Ctt
@smurfsj @oki8122 @shrewddudescast @HandmaidAlberta Lol nice opinion article. Try systemic reviews https://t.co/7LJc9zfIIN
@AussieSteve6 "Among outpatient health care personnel, N95 respirators vs medical masks as worn by participants in this trial resulted in no significant difference in the incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza". https://t.co/zitYVcL1x8
@IanCopeland5 @jathorpmfm https://t.co/IPj7QEKOOt not according to $cience.