| Title |
Access to Primary Care Clinics for Patients With Chronic Pain Receiving Opioids
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Network Open, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.6928 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pooja A. Lagisetty, Nathaniel Healy, Claire Garpestad, Mary Jannausch, Renuka Tipirneni, Amy S. B. Bohnert |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 403 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 198 | 49% |
| Canada | 7 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Georgia | 1 | <1% |
| Guinea | 1 | <1% |
| Burkina Faso | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 182 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 323 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 41 | 10% |
| Scientists | 36 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 83 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 13% |
| Researcher | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 31 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 8 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 7% |
| Psychology | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 23% |
| Unknown | 32 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 712. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2024.
All research outputs
#29,454
of 25,856,138 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Network Open
#316
of 10,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#551
of 362,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Network Open
#8
of 262 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,856,138 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 128.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 262 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.