| Title |
Association of Gestational Weight Gain With Adverse Maternal and Infant Outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jama.2019.3820 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
LifeCycle Project-Maternal Obesity and Childhood Outcomes Study Group, Ellis Voerman, Susana Santos, Hazel Inskip, Pilar Amiano, Henrique Barros, Marie-Aline Charles, Leda Chatzi, George P. Chrousos, Eva Corpeleijn, Sarah Crozier, Myriam Doyon, Merete Eggesbø, Maria Pia Fantini, Sara Farchi, Francesco Forastiere, Vagelis Georgiu, Davide Gori, Wojciech Hanke, Irva Hertz-Picciotto, Barbara Heude, Marie-France Hivert, Daniel Hryhorczuk, Carmen Iñiguez, Anne M. Karvonen, Leanne K. Küpers, Hanna Lagström, Debbie A. Lawlor, Irina Lehmann, Per Magnus, Renata Majewska, Johanna Mäkelä, Yannis Manios, Monique Mommers, Camilla S. Morgen, George Moschonis, Ellen A. Nohr, Anne-Marie Nybo Andersen, Emily Oken, Agnieszka Pac, Eleni Papadopoulou, Juha Pekkanen, Costanza Pizzi, Kinga Polanska, Daniela Porta, Lorenzo Richiardi, Sheryl L. Rifas-Shiman, Nel Roeleveld, Luca Ronfani, Ana C. Santos, Marie Standl, Hein Stigum, Camilla Stoltenberg, Elisabeth Thiering, Carel Thijs, Maties Torrent, Tomas Trnovec, Marleen M. H. J. van Gelder, Lenie van Rossem, Andrea von Berg, Martine Vrijheid, Alet Wijga, Oleksandr Zvinchuk, Thorkild I. A. Sørensen, Keith Godfrey, Vincent W. V. Jaddoe, Romy Gaillard |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 89 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 15% |
| Netherlands | 9 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 10% |
| Canada | 4 | 4% |
| Portugal | 3 | 3% |
| Mexico | 2 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 30 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 51 | 57% |
| Scientists | 19 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 18 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 597 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 597 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 71 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 54 | 9% |
| Researcher | 51 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 30 | 5% |
| Other | 108 | 18% |
| Unknown | 243 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 132 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 88 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 13 | 2% |
| Other | 58 | 10% |
| Unknown | 271 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 223. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2022.
All research outputs
#176,579
of 25,870,940 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#2,535
of 36,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,499
of 366,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#61
of 376 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,870,940 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,899 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,677 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 376 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.