↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating Progression-Free Survival as a Surrogate Outcome for Health-Related Quality of Life in Oncology: A Systematic Review and Quantitative Analysis.

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Internal Medicine, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
22 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
606 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
Title
Evaluating Progression-Free Survival as a Surrogate Outcome for Health-Related Quality of Life in Oncology: A Systematic Review and Quantitative Analysis.
Published in
JAMA Internal Medicine, December 2018
DOI 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4710
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bruno Kovic, Xuejing Jin, Sean Alexander Kennedy, Mathieu Hylands, Michal Pedziwiatr, Akira Kuriyama, Huda Gomaa, Yung Lee, Morihiro Katsura, Masafumi Tada, Brian Y Hong, Sung Min Cho, Patrick Jiho Hong, Ashley M Yu, Yasmin Sivji, Augustin Toma, Li Xie, Ludwig Tsoi, Marcin Waligora, Manya Prasad, Neera Bhatnagar, Lehana Thabane, Michael Brundage, Gordon Guyatt, Feng Xie

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 606 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 130 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 12%
Student > Master 14 11%
Other 12 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 7%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 54 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 29%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 62 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 553. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2023.
All research outputs
#43,896
of 25,529,543 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Internal Medicine
#389
of 11,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#807
of 446,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Internal Medicine
#11
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,529,543 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,668 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 84.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,573 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.