| Title |
Association of Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities With Outcomes Among Patients Hospitalized With Acute Myocardial Infarction, Heart Failure, and Pneumonia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Network Open, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.2044 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicholas S. Downing, Changqin Wang, Aakriti Gupta, Yongfei Wang, Sudhakar V. Nuti, Joseph S. Ross, Susannah M. Bernheim, Zhenqiu Lin, Sharon-Lise T. Normand, Harlan M. Krumholz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 18 | 53% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 12% |
| Canada | 2 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Malta | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Guinea | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 6 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 12 | 35% |
| Members of the public | 11 | 32% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 24% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 10 | 16% |
| Researcher | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 24% |
| Unknown | 19 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 21 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,133,655
of 25,022,483 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Network Open
#4,522
of 9,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,060
of 341,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Network Open
#84
of 152 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,022,483 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,174 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 129.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 152 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.