| Title |
Use of Death Counts From Vital Statistics to Calculate Excess Deaths in Puerto Rico Following Hurricane Maria
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jama.2018.10929 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alexis R. Santos-Lozada, Jeffrey T. Howard |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 221 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 94 | 43% |
| Puerto Rico | 24 | 11% |
| Canada | 6 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Sao Tome and Principe | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 1% |
| Unknown | 80 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 185 | 84% |
| Scientists | 17 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 11 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 15% |
| Researcher | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 9% |
| Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 20% |
| Unknown | 14 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 28% |
| Unknown | 16 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 676. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2022.
All research outputs
#31,726
of 25,701,027 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#704
of 36,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#617
of 358,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#12
of 389 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,701,027 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,727 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,317 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 389 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.