↓ Skip to main content

Breast Cancer Mortality After a Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Oncology, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#41 of 3,345)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
507 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
503 Mendeley
Title
Breast Cancer Mortality After a Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
Published in
JAMA Oncology, October 2015
DOI 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2510
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steven A. Narod, Javaid Iqbal, Vasily Giannakeas, Victoria Sopik, Ping Sun

Abstract

Women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), or stage 0 breast cancer, often experience a second primary breast cancer (DCIS or invasive), and some ultimately die of breast cancer. To estimate the 10- and 20-year mortality from breast cancer following a diagnosis of DCIS and to establish whether the mortality rate is influenced by age at diagnosis, ethnicity, and initial treatment received. Observational study of women who received a diagnosis of DCIS from 1988 to 2011 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 18 registries database. Age at diagnosis, race/ethnicity, pathologic features, date of second primary breast cancer, cause of death, and survival were abstracted for 108 196 women. Their risk of dying of breast cancer was compared with that of women in the general population. Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) for death from DCIS by age at diagnosis, clinical features, ethnicity, and treatment. Ten- and 20-year breast cancer-specific mortality. Among the 108 196 women with DCIS, the mean (range) age at diagnosis of DCIS was 53.8 (15-69) years and the mean (range) duration of follow-up was 7.5 (0-23.9) years. At 20 years, the breast cancer-specific mortality was 3.3% (95% CI, 3.0%-3.6%) overall and was higher for women who received a diagnosis before age 35 years compared with older women (7.8% vs 3.2%; HR, 2.58 [95% CI, 1.85-3.60]; P < .001) and for blacks compared with non-Hispanic whites (7.0% vs 3.0%; HR, 2.55 [95% CI, 2.17-3.01]; P < .001). The risk of dying of breast cancer increased after experience of an ipsilateral invasive breast cancer (HR, 18.1 [95% CI, 14.0-23.6]; P < .001). A total of 517 patients died of breast cancer following a DCIS diagnosis (mean follow-up, 7.5 [range, 0-23.9] years) without experiencing an in-breast invasive cancer prior to death. Among patients who received lumpectomy, radiotherapy was associated with a reduction in the risk of ipsilateral invasive recurrence at 10 years (2.5% vs 4.9%; adjusted HR, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.42-0.53]; P < .001) but not of breast cancer-specific mortality at 10 years (0.8% vs 0.9%; HR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.67-1.10]; P = .22). Important risk factors for death from breast cancer following a DCIS diagnosis include age at diagnosis and black ethnicity. The risk of death increases after a diagnosis of an ipsilateral second primary invasive breast cancer, but prevention of these recurrences by radiotherapy does not diminish breast cancer mortality at 10 years.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 302 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 503 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 492 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 74 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 13%
Other 47 9%
Student > Master 45 9%
Student > Bachelor 44 9%
Other 130 26%
Unknown 100 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 227 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 41 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 5%
Engineering 14 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 2%
Other 65 13%
Unknown 119 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 778. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2024.
All research outputs
#25,080
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Oncology
#41
of 3,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222
of 290,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Oncology
#1
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 84.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.