RT @DanaLarsen: Remember all those news stories last year about how there's a huge spike in car accidents on April 20? Well, turns out that…
Do we have anything as crazy as that here @AODMediaWatch?
Thread... (As a side note, we need more of these types of discussions in #MedEd and less Krebs’ cycle)
RT @DanaLarsen: Remember all those news stories last year about how there's a huge spike in car accidents on April 20? Well, turns out that…
Remember all those news stories last year about how there's a huge spike in car accidents on April 20? Well, turns out that was a bunch of baloney.
RT @Chris_Auld: A rant about the state of statistical work in (clinical) medical journals: 4/20 "Weed day" edition. Last year @JAMAInterna…
RT @Chris_Auld: A rant about the state of statistical work in (clinical) medical journals: 4/20 "Weed day" edition. Last year @JAMAInterna…
RT @Chris_Auld: A rant about the state of statistical work in (clinical) medical journals: 4/20 "Weed day" edition. Last year @JAMAInterna…
This paper is simultaneously an embarrassment to the entire medical profession, and unsurprising given the quality of statistical work that somehow makes it into major medical journals.
RT @Chris_Auld: A rant about the state of statistical work in (clinical) medical journals: 4/20 "Weed day" edition. Last year @JAMAInterna…
RT @dianemgoldstein: A great thread @NickMorrowPI on cannabis DUID on #420 https://t.co/z4Nc4ooD3X
Good thread
RT @dianemgoldstein: A great thread @NickMorrowPI on cannabis DUID on #420 https://t.co/z4Nc4ooD3X
RT @dianemgoldstein: A great thread @NickMorrowPI on cannabis DUID on #420 https://t.co/z4Nc4ooD3X
RT @Chris_Auld: A rant about the state of statistical work in (clinical) medical journals: 4/20 "Weed day" edition. Last year @JAMAInterna…
RT @ceptional: JAMA Internal Medicine, this is appalling. Even if stoned I wouldn't do such a stupid statistical analysis. And I'm not even…
Nice thread!
A great thread @NickMorrowPI on cannabis DUID on #420
RT @Chris_Auld: A rant about the state of statistical work in (clinical) medical journals: 4/20 "Weed day" edition. Last year @JAMAInterna…
RT @Chris_Auld: A rant about the state of statistical work in (clinical) medical journals: 4/20 "Weed day" edition. Last year @JAMAInterna…
RT @jflier: Bad study design, bad statistics, bad peer review, bad reporting. Bad, bad, bad. @JAMAInternalMed https://t.co/NOoXFt115w
RT @Chris_Auld: A rant about the state of statistical work in (clinical) medical journals: 4/20 "Weed day" edition. Last year @JAMAInterna…
RT @Chris_Auld: A rant about the state of statistical work in (clinical) medical journals: 4/20 "Weed day" edition. Last year @JAMAInterna…
RT @Chris_Auld: A rant about the state of statistical work in (clinical) medical journals: 4/20 "Weed day" edition. Last year @JAMAInterna…
RT @Chris_Auld: A rant about the state of statistical work in (clinical) medical journals: 4/20 "Weed day" edition. Last year @JAMAInterna…
RT @jflier: Bad study design, bad statistics, bad peer review, bad reporting. Bad, bad, bad. @JAMAInternalMed https://t.co/NOoXFt115w
The problem is that editors like headline-grabbing papers -good for the JIF. Much more important too editors than the results being right. That's why they refuse to do anything about the myth of "statistically significant" @Chris_Auld
RT @Chris_Auld: A rant about the state of statistical work in (clinical) medical journals: 4/20 "Weed day" edition. Last year @JAMAInterna…
It's worth it to read the entire thread.
n=3 is not good stats.
Bad study design, bad statistics, bad peer review, bad reporting. Bad, bad, bad. @JAMAInternalMed
RT @Chris_Auld: A rant about the state of statistical work in (clinical) medical journals: 4/20 "Weed day" edition. Last year @JAMAInterna…
RT @Chris_Auld: A rant about the state of statistical work in (clinical) medical journals: 4/20 "Weed day" edition. Last year @JAMAInterna…
RT @Chris_Auld: A rant about the state of statistical work in (clinical) medical journals: 4/20 "Weed day" edition. Last year @JAMAInterna…
A good thread.
RT @GaborBekes: Awesome review on bad science published in a top journal. Teachable moment on what sample size means, too. Thx. https://t.c…
For the love of reason, statistics, and accurate weed research, please retweet this far and wide.
Great thread by @Chris_Auld on poor design and analysis in high profile studies, media “blow up” and propagation of these stories and the fact the correct re-analysis doesn’t get same attention - note this impacts every area not just medicine
Debates are settled, policy is enacted on crap like this every day. People fall for "studies have shown" with its apparent rigor of using decimal points and tables and charts. A correct stats study has 10x narrower implications, 10x more caveats and is 1
RT @Chris_Auld: A rant about the state of statistical work in (clinical) medical journals: 4/20 "Weed day" edition. Last year @JAMAInterna…
RT @Chris_Auld: A rant about the state of statistical work in (clinical) medical journals: 4/20 "Weed day" edition. Last year @JAMAInterna…
Thread.
RT @GaborBekes: Awesome review on bad science published in a top journal. Teachable moment on what sample size means, too. Thx. https://t.c…
RT @Chris_Auld: A rant about the state of statistical work in (clinical) medical journals: 4/20 "Weed day" edition. Last year @JAMAInterna…
RT @Chris_Auld: A rant about the state of statistical work in (clinical) medical journals: 4/20 "Weed day" edition. Last year @JAMAInterna…
RT @Chris_Auld: A rant about the state of statistical work in (clinical) medical journals: 4/20 "Weed day" edition. Last year @JAMAInterna…
RT @Chris_Auld: A rant about the state of statistical work in (clinical) medical journals: 4/20 "Weed day" edition. Last year @JAMAInterna…
RT @Chris_Auld: A rant about the state of statistical work in (clinical) medical journals: 4/20 "Weed day" edition. Last year @JAMAInterna…
RT @Chris_Auld: A rant about the state of statistical work in (clinical) medical journals: 4/20 "Weed day" edition. Last year @JAMAInterna…
RT @Chris_Auld: A rant about the state of statistical work in (clinical) medical journals: 4/20 "Weed day" edition. Last year @JAMAInterna…
RT @Chris_Auld: A rant about the state of statistical work in (clinical) medical journals: 4/20 "Weed day" edition. Last year @JAMAInterna…
RT @Chris_Auld: A rant about the state of statistical work in (clinical) medical journals: 4/20 "Weed day" edition. Last year @JAMAInterna…
RT @Chris_Auld: A rant about the state of statistical work in (clinical) medical journals: 4/20 "Weed day" edition. Last year @JAMAInterna…
RT @GaborBekes: Awesome review on bad science published in a top journal. Teachable moment on what sample size means, too. Thx. https://t.c…
RT @GaborBekes: Awesome review on bad science published in a top journal. Teachable moment on what sample size means, too. Thx. https://t.c…
RT @Chris_Auld: A rant about the state of statistical work in (clinical) medical journals: 4/20 "Weed day" edition. Last year @JAMAInterna…
RT @GaborBekes: Awesome review on bad science published in a top journal. Teachable moment on what sample size means, too. Thx. https://t.c…
RT @Chris_Auld: A rant about the state of statistical work in (clinical) medical journals: 4/20 "Weed day" edition. Last year @JAMAInterna…
RT @Chris_Auld: A rant about the state of statistical work in (clinical) medical journals: 4/20 "Weed day" edition. Last year @JAMAInterna…
RT @Chris_Auld: A rant about the state of statistical work in (clinical) medical journals: 4/20 "Weed day" edition. Last year @JAMAInterna…
I really hate abuse of statistics.
RT @Chris_Auld: A rant about the state of statistical work in (clinical) medical journals: 4/20 "Weed day" edition. Last year @JAMAInterna…
RT @Chris_Auld: A rant about the state of statistical work in (clinical) medical journals: 4/20 "Weed day" edition. Last year @JAMAInterna…
Good thread on a new paper (https://t.co/qZ0HnUweak) de-bunking the idea that there's a spike in accidents on 4/20 due to stoned drivers. Reminds me of a recent paper by @OrbenAmy and @ShuhBillSkee showing there's not much evidence of the harmful effects o
@alex_gude would like this
RT @Chris_Auld: A rant about the state of statistical work in (clinical) medical journals: 4/20 "Weed day" edition. Last year @JAMAInterna…
RT @Chris_Auld: A rant about the state of statistical work in (clinical) medical journals: 4/20 "Weed day" edition. Last year @JAMAInterna…
RT @Chris_Auld: A rant about the state of statistical work in (clinical) medical journals: 4/20 "Weed day" edition. Last year @JAMAInterna…
RT @chris_brockett: This is a great lesson on how not to do statistics. In any field. https://t.co/otX9raLARM
This is great. I am convinced JAMA has a serious anti cannabis bias and it shows in what they publish and how little scrutiny they give to anything that’s casts cannabis in a negative light
RT @Chris_Auld: A rant about the state of statistical work in (clinical) medical journals: 4/20 "Weed day" edition. Last year @JAMAInterna…
RT @Chris_Auld: A rant about the state of statistical work in (clinical) medical journals: 4/20 "Weed day" edition. Last year @JAMAInterna…
RT @Chris_Auld: A rant about the state of statistical work in (clinical) medical journals: 4/20 "Weed day" edition. Last year @JAMAInterna…
RT @Chris_Auld: A rant about the state of statistical work in (clinical) medical journals: 4/20 "Weed day" edition. Last year @JAMAInterna…
RT @Chris_Auld: A rant about the state of statistical work in (clinical) medical journals: 4/20 "Weed day" edition. Last year @JAMAInterna…
RT @Chris_Auld: A rant about the state of statistical work in (clinical) medical journals: 4/20 "Weed day" edition. Last year @JAMAInterna…
Good rant.
RT @Chris_Auld: A rant about the state of statistical work in (clinical) medical journals: 4/20 "Weed day" edition. Last year @JAMAInterna…
“But the paper was deeply methodologically flawed, and the media should follow up by also reporting that the sexy result turned out to be nonsense, perhaps the more interesting story.“
RT @MEinRhyme: @KyrieMeMo Three For Responsibility: 1. Partake. 2. Enjoy. 3. Make sure it doesn't interfere with anyone else's life or deat…
RT @Chris_Auld: A rant about the state of statistical work in (clinical) medical journals: 4/20 "Weed day" edition. Last year @JAMAInterna…
RT @Chris_Auld: A rant about the state of statistical work in (clinical) medical journals: 4/20 "Weed day" edition. Last year @JAMAInterna…
Bullshit asymmetry principle even with statistical research...
RT @ceptional: JAMA Internal Medicine, this is appalling. Even if stoned I wouldn't do such a stupid statistical analysis. And I'm not even…
@KyrieMeMo Three For Responsibility: 1. Partake. 2. Enjoy. 3. Make sure it doesn't interfere with anyone else's life or death. ========================= Statistics to re-hash- April 20 and the fatal car crash.
RT @Chris_Auld: A rant about the state of statistical work in (clinical) medical journals: 4/20 "Weed day" edition. Last year @JAMAInterna…
RT @Chris_Auld: A rant about the state of statistical work in (clinical) medical journals: 4/20 "Weed day" edition. Last year @JAMAInterna…
Good thread. Take a stats class, people!
RT @Chris_Auld: A rant about the state of statistical work in (clinical) medical journals: 4/20 "Weed day" edition. Last year @JAMAInterna…
RT @Chris_Auld: A rant about the state of statistical work in (clinical) medical journals: 4/20 "Weed day" edition. Last year @JAMAInterna…
RT @Chris_Auld: A rant about the state of statistical work in (clinical) medical journals: 4/20 "Weed day" edition. Last year @JAMAInterna…
RT @Chris_Auld: A rant about the state of statistical work in (clinical) medical journals: 4/20 "Weed day" edition. Last year @JAMAInterna…
RT @Chris_Auld: A rant about the state of statistical work in (clinical) medical journals: 4/20 "Weed day" edition. Last year @JAMAInterna…
RT @GaborBekes: Awesome review on bad science published in a top journal. Teachable moment on what sample size means, too. Thx. https://t.c…
@KyrieMeMo Three For Responsibility: 1. Partake. 2. Enjoy. 3. Make sure it doen's interfere with anyone else's life or death. ========================= Statistics to re-hash- April 20 and the fatal car crash.
RT @Chris_Auld: A rant about the state of statistical work in (clinical) medical journals: 4/20 "Weed day" edition. Last year @JAMAInterna…
The hazy holiday ain't as dangerous as @JAMAInternalMed would have you believe.
RT @Chris_Auld: A rant about the state of statistical work in (clinical) medical journals: 4/20 "Weed day" edition. Last year @JAMAInterna…
RT @Chris_Auld: A rant about the state of statistical work in (clinical) medical journals: 4/20 "Weed day" edition. Last year @JAMAInterna…
RT @Chris_Auld: A rant about the state of statistical work in (clinical) medical journals: 4/20 "Weed day" edition. Last year @JAMAInterna…