↓ Skip to main content

Unintended Consequences of Machine Learning in Medicine

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
426 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
687 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Unintended Consequences of Machine Learning in Medicine
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, August 2017
DOI 10.1001/jama.2017.7797
Pubmed ID
Authors

Federico Cabitza, Raffaele Rasoini, Gian Franco Gensini

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 814 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 687 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 687 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 126 18%
Researcher 109 16%
Student > Bachelor 62 9%
Student > Master 60 9%
Other 50 7%
Other 146 21%
Unknown 134 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 180 26%
Computer Science 84 12%
Engineering 47 7%
Social Sciences 32 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 3%
Other 134 20%
Unknown 189 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 570. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2022.
All research outputs
#29,826
of 21,491,544 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#730
of 31,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#774
of 286,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#17
of 384 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,491,544 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,873 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 71.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,773 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 384 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.