| Title |
Perspectives of Patients About Immediate Access to Test Results Through an Online Patient Portal
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Network Open, March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.3572 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bryan D. Steitz, Robert W. Turer, Chen-Tan Lin, Scott MacDonald, Liz Salmi, Adam Wright, Christoph U. Lehmann, Karen Langford, Samuel A. McDonald, Thomas J. Reese, Paul Sternberg, Qingxia Chen, S. Trent Rosenbloom, Catherine M. DesRoches |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 281 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 138 | 49% |
| Canada | 20 | 7% |
| Spain | 15 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 2% |
| Australia | 5 | 2% |
| Kenya | 3 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Tunisia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 2% |
| Unknown | 84 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 165 | 59% |
| Scientists | 64 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 42 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 10 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Researcher | 4 | 9% |
| Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 26 | 58% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 23 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 690. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2024.
All research outputs
#31,051
of 25,845,895 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Network Open
#336
of 10,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#830
of 425,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Network Open
#20
of 575 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,845,895 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,001 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 128.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 575 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.