| Title |
Multilevel Factors Associated With Time to Biopsy After Abnormal Screening Mammography Results by Race and Ethnicity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Oncology, August 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.1990 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marissa B. Lawson, Michael C. S. Bissell, Diana L. Miglioretti, Joanna Eavey, Christina H. Chapman, Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Tracy Onega, Louise M. Henderson, Garth H. Rauscher, Karla Kerlikowske, Brian L. Sprague, Erin J. A. Bowles, Charlotte C. Gard, Sana Parsian, Christoph I. Lee |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 58% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Djibouti | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 71% |
| Scientists | 5 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Librarian | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 16 | 57% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 18 | 64% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 497. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2023.
All research outputs
#52,203
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Oncology
#97
of 3,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,677
of 431,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Oncology
#3
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,308 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 84.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,340 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.