Radiofrequency Radiation and Cancer: A Review https://t.co/QE8cLRy4nV
@trelayne @HughThunkIt @SolNataMD @Debunk_the_Funk Thanks! I'd simply suggest the connection in humans isn't yet well established. NTP concludes: "a potential for adverse health outcomes in humans remains a question." https://t.co/IKUxDs22cn https://t.co
@semilion235 @cynicaltype Yeah, that doesn't mean why you seem to think it does - and the quality is really poor. I talk about ROS production here, and so do the FDA (linked within) https://t.co/GGFw2cjh1s
@MFeychting @KFosterUPenn @frankdevocht @dave_ehs Thoughts on this "review" - looks to be incorrect. https://t.co/aXbbCynfdH
RT @LouisSlesin: That @JAMAOnc published this tendentious review of #RF and cancer is nothing short of staggering. Chock-full of errors and…
RT @LouisSlesin: That @JAMAOnc published this tendentious review of #RF and cancer is nothing short of staggering. Chock-full of errors and…
@LouisSlesin @MicrowaveNews @drg1985 @DCU ok, so we just checked and the article is still there. Why aren't they correcting it? Its wrong. https://t.co/aXbbCynfdH
@MicrowaveNews @JAMAOnc @JAMANetwork @thackerpd it is still up???? How can this be? What can members of the public do to help? Is JAMA allowed to post lies? https://t.co/aXbbCy5Em9
.@KFosterUPenn don't you and @MartinRoosli think it's time @JAMAOnc and @DrNDisis #retract the Grimes "review" study now that we know he falsified his credentials—which is shocking & impugns JAMA's credibility? https://t.co/deK9bKg9Fa cc: @thackerpd
RT @LouisSlesin: That @JAMAOnc published this tendentious review of #RF and cancer is nothing short of staggering. Chock-full of errors and…
I finally got around to reading the below paper on #RF #radiation and #cancer risk 1/n
RT @LouisSlesin: That @JAMAOnc published this tendentious review of #RF and cancer is nothing short of staggering. Chock-full of errors and…
RT @LouisSlesin: Grimes was paid by @VodafoneUK. He says he gave the fees to @MSF in his CoI in @JAMAOnc, published yesterday.👇 The CoI is…
Grimes was paid by @VodafoneUK. He says he gave the fees to @MSF in his CoI in @JAMAOnc, published yesterday.👇 The CoI is deceptive: The video dismisses all #5G risks, not just any link to COVID-19. Its title: "5G and Health: Everything You Need To Know."
RT @LouisSlesin: That @JAMAOnc published this tendentious review of #RF and cancer is nothing short of staggering. Chock-full of errors and…
@JAMANetwork @Forbes @JAMA_current Why did you publish this review study---which failed to include in its review the largest, most expensive (and consequential) study ever conducted by the U.S. Government's NTP on the subject matter? https://t.co/6j09gCLh
RT @LouisSlesin: That @JAMAOnc published this tendentious review of #RF and cancer is nothing short of staggering. Chock-full of errors and…
That @JAMAOnc published this tendentious review of #RF and cancer is nothing short of staggering. Chock-full of errors and omissions. No cite to $30MM NTP study! Was it peer reviewed by anyone unaffiliated with ICNIRP or its allies? Shame on @JAMANetwork.
Radiofrequency Radiation and Cancer: A Review https://t.co/hNhs89LK2R #Cancer
.@MartinRoosli @frankdevocht @MFeychting @berkeleyprc @JavierdeVila
RT @drkpavithran: Current evidence does not support a link between radiofrequency radiation and carcinogenesis - need higher-quality future…
Any real #epidemiologist to comment? https://t.co/UdypRdXCKK
Current evidence does not support a link between radiofrequency radiation and carcinogenesis - need higher-quality future research https://t.co/jNhrFuXewA https://t.co/nti3UblbpI
I get asked a lot whether radiofrequency radiation from cell phones, routers etc is a #cancer risk. Almost certainty not, given the current evidence base - review just out in @JAMAOnc if you're curious... https://t.co/GGFw2c1G9U https://t.co/oP6coiApCz